Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Does Yakhot's growth law for turbulent burning velocity hold?

Wenjia Jing, Jack Xin, Yifeng Yu

TL;DR

The paper addresses how the turbulent flame speed $s_{\rm T}(p,A)$ in the inviscid G-equation grows with flow intensity $A$, testing Yakhot's $O\left(\frac{A}{\sqrt{\log A}}\right)$ prediction. It develops a rigorous 2D analysis based on the control representation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and a detailed streamline-cell structure, proving there is no intermediate growth between $O\left(\frac{A}{\log A}\right)$ and $O(A)$ for Lipschitz incompressible periodic flows with bounded swirls, while allowing degeneracies in critical points. The work also discusses unsteady flows and lower-regularity regimes, showing $O\left(\frac{A}{\log A}\right)$ or $O(A)$ growth can occur, and that half-log-Lipschitz regularity could yield $O\left(\frac{A}{\sqrt{\log A}}\right)$ under certain constructions. In 3D, especially for ABC and Kolmogorov-type flows, linear growth in $A$ is observed in relevant regimes, while unsteady cellular flows can maintain $O(A/\log A)$ bounds. Together, the results delineate how regularity, chaos, and multi-scale cell structures influence front-speed scaling in turbulent combustion within the G-equation framework.

Abstract

Using formal renormalization theory, Yakhot derived in ([32], 1988) an $O\left(\frac{A}{\sqrt{\log A}}\right)$ growth law of the turbulent flame speed with respect to large flow intensity $A$ based on the inviscid G-equation. Although this growth law is widely cited in combustion literature, there has been no rigorous mathematical discussion to date about its validity. As a first step towards unveiling the mystery, we prove that there is no intermediate growth law between $O\left(\frac{A}{\log A}\right)$ and $O(A)$ for two dimensional incompressible Lipschitz continuous periodic flows with bounded swirl sizes. In particular, we do not assume the non-degeneracy of critical points. Additionally, other examples of flows with lower regularity, Lagrangian chaos, and related phenomena are also discussed.

Does Yakhot's growth law for turbulent burning velocity hold?

TL;DR

The paper addresses how the turbulent flame speed in the inviscid G-equation grows with flow intensity , testing Yakhot's prediction. It develops a rigorous 2D analysis based on the control representation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and a detailed streamline-cell structure, proving there is no intermediate growth between and for Lipschitz incompressible periodic flows with bounded swirls, while allowing degeneracies in critical points. The work also discusses unsteady flows and lower-regularity regimes, showing or growth can occur, and that half-log-Lipschitz regularity could yield under certain constructions. In 3D, especially for ABC and Kolmogorov-type flows, linear growth in is observed in relevant regimes, while unsteady cellular flows can maintain bounds. Together, the results delineate how regularity, chaos, and multi-scale cell structures influence front-speed scaling in turbulent combustion within the G-equation framework.

Abstract

Using formal renormalization theory, Yakhot derived in ([32], 1988) an growth law of the turbulent flame speed with respect to large flow intensity based on the inviscid G-equation. Although this growth law is widely cited in combustion literature, there has been no rigorous mathematical discussion to date about its validity. As a first step towards unveiling the mystery, we prove that there is no intermediate growth law between and for two dimensional incompressible Lipschitz continuous periodic flows with bounded swirl sizes. In particular, we do not assume the non-degeneracy of critical points. Additionally, other examples of flows with lower regularity, Lagrangian chaos, and related phenomena are also discussed.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 13 theorems, 114 equations, 7 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Assume that $V\in W^{1,\infty}(\mathbb{T}^2, {\mathbb R}^2)$ is incompressible, mean zero and its swirls have uniformly bounded sizes. That is, $\mathrm{div}(V)=0$, a.e., eq:boundedswirl and eq:meanzero hold. Then, either (1) or (2) in the following holds:

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: G-equation model.
  • Figure 4: New coordinate system near $x$.
  • Figure 5: Possible relations between $R_{\xi_y}$ (region enclosed by the orbit $\xi_y$ which is partially shown in blue color) and $U^\pm_x(H(y))$.
  • Figure 6: Picture of $R_\xi$ and a cell $S$
  • Figure 7: Construction of a cell close to an orbit that is asymptotic to $\Gamma$
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (30)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Remark 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.4
  • ...and 20 more