Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Existence of a Model of $o(κ)=κ^{++}$ from Failure of GCH at a Measurable Cardinal

Connor Watson

TL;DR

The paper provides an expository, detail-filled proof of the lower bound for the equiconsistency between the failure of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis at a measurable cardinal and the existence of a measurable cardinal with Mitchell order $o(\lambda)=\lambda^{++}$. It clarifies and fills gaps in the literature by elaborating on a core-model framework (up to $o(\kappa)=\kappa^{++}$) and the use of iterated ultrapowers, normal ultrafilters, and Fodor-type arguments. The result shows that if $2^{\kappa}>\kappa^{+}$ for some measurable $\kappa$, then there is an inner model containing a measurable cardinal $\lambda$ with $o(\lambda)=\lambda^{++}$. This strengthens the accessibility of Mitchell-style core model arguments and connects GCH failure at a measurable cardinal to precise large-cardinal strength statements.

Abstract

It is well-known that the consistency strength of the GCH failing at a measurable cardinal is the existence of a cardinal $κ$ with $o(κ)=κ^{++}$. As the literature does not contain more than a proof sketch of the lower bound of this equiconsistency, we give an expository proof which fills in the details in order to fill this gap in the literature.

Existence of a Model of $o(κ)=κ^{++}$ from Failure of GCH at a Measurable Cardinal

TL;DR

The paper provides an expository, detail-filled proof of the lower bound for the equiconsistency between the failure of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis at a measurable cardinal and the existence of a measurable cardinal with Mitchell order . It clarifies and fills gaps in the literature by elaborating on a core-model framework (up to ) and the use of iterated ultrapowers, normal ultrafilters, and Fodor-type arguments. The result shows that if for some measurable , then there is an inner model containing a measurable cardinal with . This strengthens the accessibility of Mitchell-style core model arguments and connects GCH failure at a measurable cardinal to precise large-cardinal strength statements.

Abstract

It is well-known that the consistency strength of the GCH failing at a measurable cardinal is the existence of a cardinal with . As the literature does not contain more than a proof sketch of the lower bound of this equiconsistency, we give an expository proof which fills in the details in order to fill this gap in the literature.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 2 theorems, 3 equations.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. The Proof

Key Result

Lemma 2.2

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof
  • Claim 2.1
  • proof
  • Claim 2.2
  • proof
  • Claim 2.3
  • proof