Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Characterization of Word-Representable Graphs using Modular Decomposition

Tithi Dwary, K. V. Krishna

TL;DR

This paper characterizes word-representable graphs through modular decomposition by showing that replacing a module $M$ at a vertex with $G_a[M]$ preserves word-representability exactly when the base graph $G$ is word-representable and the module $M$ is a comparability graph, with a tight formula for the permutation-representation number $\mathcal{R}^p$. Leveraging this, it provides a complete modular-decomposition-based criterion: a decomposable graph $G$ is word-representable iff every module $G[M_i]$ is a comparability graph and the quotient $G/\mathcal{P}$ is word-representable, and it gives the explicit representation-number bound $\mathcal{R}(G)=\max\{\mathcal{R}(G/\mathcal{P}), \mathcal{R}^p(G[M_1]),\ldots, \mathcal{R}^p(G[M_k])\}$. The paper also resolves the open problem on the word-representability of the lexicographical product $G[G']$, showing $G[G']$ is word-representable iff $G$ is word-representable and $G'$ is a comparability graph, with $\mathcal{R}(G[G'])=\max\{\mathcal{R}(G), \mathcal{R}^p(G')\}$. Collectively, these results yield a polynomial-time test for non-word-representability via modular decomposition and offer a pathway to identify new classes of word-representable graphs through structural decomposition.

Abstract

In this work, we characterize the class of word-representable graphs with respect to the modular decomposition. Consequently, we determine the representation number of a word-representable graph in terms of the permutation-representation numbers of the modules and the representation number of the associated quotient graph. In this connection, we also obtain a complete answer to the open problem posed by Kitaev and Lozin on the word-representability of the lexicographical product of graphs.

Characterization of Word-Representable Graphs using Modular Decomposition

TL;DR

This paper characterizes word-representable graphs through modular decomposition by showing that replacing a module at a vertex with preserves word-representability exactly when the base graph is word-representable and the module is a comparability graph, with a tight formula for the permutation-representation number . Leveraging this, it provides a complete modular-decomposition-based criterion: a decomposable graph is word-representable iff every module is a comparability graph and the quotient is word-representable, and it gives the explicit representation-number bound . The paper also resolves the open problem on the word-representability of the lexicographical product , showing is word-representable iff is word-representable and is a comparability graph, with . Collectively, these results yield a polynomial-time test for non-word-representability via modular decomposition and offer a pathway to identify new classes of word-representable graphs through structural decomposition.

Abstract

In this work, we characterize the class of word-representable graphs with respect to the modular decomposition. Consequently, we determine the representation number of a word-representable graph in terms of the permutation-representation numbers of the modules and the representation number of the associated quotient graph. In this connection, we also obtain a complete answer to the open problem posed by Kitaev and Lozin on the word-representability of the lexicographical product of graphs.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 9 theorems, 1 figure.

Key Result

theorem 1

Let $\mathcal{P} = \{M_1, M_2, \ldots, M_k\}$ be a modular partition of a decomposable graph $G$. Then $G$ is a comparability graph if and only if $G/\mathcal{P}$ and each of the induced subgraphs $G[M_i]$ are comparability graphs.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Replacing the vertex $a$ of $G$ with the module $C_5$

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • remark 1
  • theorem 1: Golumbicbook_2004Mohring_1985
  • remark 2
  • theorem 2: Kitaev_2013
  • theorem 3
  • theorem 4
  • proof
  • theorem 5
  • proof
  • remark 3
  • ...and 7 more