Leveraging Consistent Spatio-Temporal Correspondence for Robust Visual Odometry
Zhaoxing Zhang, Junda Cheng, Gangwei Xu, Xiaoxiang Wang, Can Zhang, Xin Yang
TL;DR
This work tackles robustness and drift in visual odometry by leveraging spatio-temporal cues to improve multi-frame flow matching. It introduces STVO, a deep architecture with a Temporal Propagation Module and a Spatial Activation Module that mutually reinforce temporal and spatial consistency, integrated with a differentiable bundle adjustment backend. The approach achieves state-of-the-art results on TUM-RGBD, EuRoC MAV, ETH3D, and KITTI Odometry, including substantial improvements on ETH3D (77.8%) and KITTI (38.9%) over prior best methods. The findings highlight the importance of exploiting both spatial and temporal coherence in multi-frame flow estimation for robust, low-drift VO in challenging environments and long sequences.
Abstract
Recent approaches to VO have significantly improved performance by using deep networks to predict optical flow between video frames. However, existing methods still suffer from noisy and inconsistent flow matching, making it difficult to handle challenging scenarios and long-sequence estimation. To overcome these challenges, we introduce Spatio-Temporal Visual Odometry (STVO), a novel deep network architecture that effectively leverages inherent spatio-temporal cues to enhance the accuracy and consistency of multi-frame flow matching. With more accurate and consistent flow matching, STVO can achieve better pose estimation through the bundle adjustment (BA). Specifically, STVO introduces two innovative components: 1) the Temporal Propagation Module that utilizes multi-frame information to extract and propagate temporal cues across adjacent frames, maintaining temporal consistency; 2) the Spatial Activation Module that utilizes geometric priors from the depth maps to enhance spatial consistency while filtering out excessive noise and incorrect matches. Our STVO achieves state-of-the-art performance on TUM-RGBD, EuRoc MAV, ETH3D and KITTI Odometry benchmarks. Notably, it improves accuracy by 77.8% on ETH3D benchmark and 38.9% on KITTI Odometry benchmark over the previous best methods.
