Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Efficient points in a sum of sets of alternatives

Anas Mifrani

TL;DR

The paper addresses when the efficient-point set of a sum, $\mathscr{E}(A+B)$, coincides with $\mathscr{E}(A)$ under a general relation $R$ on a (not necessarily abelian) group $(G,+)$. It develops a framework with properties (P1)–(P5) and distinguishes finite vs infinite $A$, providing broad sufficient conditions (extending the Yu–Ehrgott result) and a range of counterexamples showing failure under other configurations. Key contributions include precise theorems that guarantee equality in certain isotone/additive settings and that guarantee non-equality when $A$ is finite and $B$ contains elements incomparable with $0_G$, plus a detailed appendix with cycle-based proofs that underpin the finite-case results. The work broadens the scope of efficient-point analysis beyond Euclidean spaces, offers insights for potential algorithmic approaches to computing $\mathscr{E}(A+B)$, and points to extensions to semigroups, lattices, cones, and stochastic/graph-structured decision problems.

Abstract

The concept of efficiency plays a prominent role in the formal solution of decision problems that involve incomparable alternatives. This paper develops necessary and sufficient conditions for the efficient points in a sum of sets of alternatives to be identical to the efficient points in one of the summands. Some of the conditions cover both finite and infinite sets; others are shown to hold only for finite sets. Examples are provided that illustrate these results.

Efficient points in a sum of sets of alternatives

TL;DR

The paper addresses when the efficient-point set of a sum, , coincides with under a general relation on a (not necessarily abelian) group . It develops a framework with properties (P1)–(P5) and distinguishes finite vs infinite , providing broad sufficient conditions (extending the Yu–Ehrgott result) and a range of counterexamples showing failure under other configurations. Key contributions include precise theorems that guarantee equality in certain isotone/additive settings and that guarantee non-equality when is finite and contains elements incomparable with , plus a detailed appendix with cycle-based proofs that underpin the finite-case results. The work broadens the scope of efficient-point analysis beyond Euclidean spaces, offers insights for potential algorithmic approaches to computing , and points to extensions to semigroups, lattices, cones, and stochastic/graph-structured decision problems.

Abstract

The concept of efficiency plays a prominent role in the formal solution of decision problems that involve incomparable alternatives. This paper develops necessary and sufficient conditions for the efficient points in a sum of sets of alternatives to be identical to the efficient points in one of the summands. Some of the conditions cover both finite and infinite sets; others are shown to hold only for finite sets. Examples are provided that illustrate these results.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 20 theorems, 46 equations, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Under (P3), $\mathscr{E}(A) = \emptyset$ implies that (E) holds.

Theorems & Definitions (58)

  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2
  • proof
  • Remark 1
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Theorem 3
  • proof
  • Theorem 4
  • ...and 48 more