Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Cyclic Representations of $U_q(\hat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2)$ and its Borel Subalgebras at Roots of Unity and Q-operators

Robert Weston

TL;DR

This work develops a systematic root-of-unity framework for $U_q(\hat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2)$ by constructing finite-dimensional cyclic representations $\Omega_{rs}$ and upper-Borel representations $\rho_r,\bar{\rho}_r,\varphi_c$ of $U_q(\mathfrak{b}_+)$. It proves a key factorization ${\mathcal{O}}(\chi): \Omega_{rs}\otimes \varphi_{c_0} \to \rho_r\otimes \bar{\rho}_s$ and establishes short exact sequences that encode fusion, together with a compatible L-operator factorization. These structural results yield Q-operator constructions for the $6$-vertex model and the $\tau_2$/Chiral Potts setting, satisfying standard TQ relations (up to gauge) and linking to the CP half-monodromy picture of Baxter’s framework. The finite-dimensional, root-of-unity setting opens avenues for higher-rank generalizations and open-system Q-operators, highlighting a coherent algebraic path from Borel representations to transfer matrices and QQ-relations. Overall, the paper clarifies how cyclic $U_q(\mathfrak{b}_+)$ representations underpin Q-operators at roots of unity and how they connect to the chiral Potts/Baxter framework.

Abstract

We consider the cyclic representations $Ω_{rs}$ of $ U_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2)$ at $q^N=1$ that depend upon two points $r,s$ in the chiral Potts algebraic curve. We show how $Ω_{rs}$ is related to the tensor product $ρ_r\otimes \barρ_s$ of two representations of the upper Borel subalgebra of $U_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2)$. This result is analogous to the factorization property of the Verma module of $U_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2)$ at generic-$q$ in terms of two q-oscillator representation of the Borel subalgebra - a key step in the construction of the Q-operator. We construct short exact sequences of the different representations and use the results to construct Q operators that satisfy TQ relations for $q^N=1$ for both the 6-vertex and $τ_2$ models.

Cyclic Representations of $U_q(\hat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2)$ and its Borel Subalgebras at Roots of Unity and Q-operators

TL;DR

This work develops a systematic root-of-unity framework for by constructing finite-dimensional cyclic representations and upper-Borel representations of . It proves a key factorization and establishes short exact sequences that encode fusion, together with a compatible L-operator factorization. These structural results yield Q-operator constructions for the -vertex model and the /Chiral Potts setting, satisfying standard TQ relations (up to gauge) and linking to the CP half-monodromy picture of Baxter’s framework. The finite-dimensional, root-of-unity setting opens avenues for higher-rank generalizations and open-system Q-operators, highlighting a coherent algebraic path from Borel representations to transfer matrices and QQ-relations. Overall, the paper clarifies how cyclic representations underpin Q-operators at roots of unity and how they connect to the chiral Potts/Baxter framework.

Abstract

We consider the cyclic representations of at that depend upon two points in the chiral Potts algebraic curve. We show how is related to the tensor product of two representations of the upper Borel subalgebra of . This result is analogous to the factorization property of the Verma module of at generic- in terms of two q-oscillator representation of the Borel subalgebra - a key step in the construction of the Q-operator. We construct short exact sequences of the different representations and use the results to construct Q operators that satisfy TQ relations for for both the 6-vertex and models.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 24 sections, 17 theorems, 119 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

The $\widetilde{U}_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2)$ isomorphism $\check{R}(rr';ss'):\Omega_{rr'}\otimes \Omega_{ss'}\rightarrow \Omega_{ss'}\otimes \Omega_{rr'}$ can be written in terms of two $\widetilde{U}_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2)$ isomorphisms as follows where in which the coefficients $\overline{W}_{rs}(n)$ and $\widehat{W}_{rs}(n)$ are chosen to satisfy the recursion relations

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Proposition 2.1: Date, Jimbo, Miki, Miwa
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Definition 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • Theorem 3.3
  • proof
  • ...and 26 more