Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Deep Learning Based Recalibration of SDSS and DESI BAO Alleviates Hubble and Clustering Tensions

Rahul Shah, Purba Mukherjee, Soumadeep Saha, Utpal Garain, Supratik Pal

TL;DR

A recalibration of two independent BAO datasets, SDSS and DESI, is presented by employing deep learning techniques for model-independent estimation of r_d, and the impacts on $\Lambda$CDM cosmological parameters are explored.

Abstract

Conventional calibration of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) data relies on estimation of the sound horizon at drag epoch $r_d$ from early universe observations by assuming a cosmological model. We present a recalibration of two independent BAO datasets, SDSS and DESI, by employing deep learning techniques for model-independent estimation of $r_d$, and explore the impacts on $Λ$CDM cosmological parameters. Significant reductions in both Hubble ($H_0$) and clustering ($S_8$) tensions are observed for both the recalibrated datasets. Moderate shifts in some other parameters hint towards further exploration of such data-driven approaches.

Deep Learning Based Recalibration of SDSS and DESI BAO Alleviates Hubble and Clustering Tensions

TL;DR

A recalibration of two independent BAO datasets, SDSS and DESI, is presented by employing deep learning techniques for model-independent estimation of r_d, and the impacts on CDM cosmological parameters are explored.

Abstract

Conventional calibration of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) data relies on estimation of the sound horizon at drag epoch from early universe observations by assuming a cosmological model. We present a recalibration of two independent BAO datasets, SDSS and DESI, by employing deep learning techniques for model-independent estimation of , and explore the impacts on CDM cosmological parameters. Significant reductions in both Hubble () and clustering () tensions are observed for both the recalibrated datasets. Moderate shifts in some other parameters hint towards further exploration of such data-driven approaches.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 1 equation, 2 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Comparison of $H_0$-$S_8$ constraints for different combinations of calibration and datasets. The gray and red shaded regions correspond to the late-time measurements of $H_0=73.04\pm1.04 \text{ km s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1}$Riess:2021jrx and $S_8 = 0.759\pm0.024$DES:2021bvc.
  • Figure 2: Comparison of constraints for different combinations of calibration and datasets. $H_0$ is in units of $\text{km s}^{-1} \text{ Mpc}^{-1}$.