SAVGBench: Benchmarking Spatially Aligned Audio-Video Generation
Kazuki Shimada, Christian Simon, Takashi Shibuya, Shusuke Takahashi, Yuki Mitsufuji
TL;DR
This work defines SAVGBench, a benchmark for Spatially Aligned Audio-Video Generation, to address the lack of multimodal models that produce videos with spatially consistent audio. It introduces a STARSS23-derived dataset of perspective video and stereo audio focusing on onscreen sound events, along with a novel Spatial AV-Align metric that evaluates spatial synchronization without requiring ground-truth audio. By evaluating a joint diffusion baseline (Stereo MM-Diffusion) and a two-stage pipeline (Video Diffusion + Stereo MMAudio), the study reveals meaningful gaps to ground truth in both audiovisual quality and spatial alignment, with the joint method showing better alignment than the two-stage approach. The benchmark and metrics provide a foundation for advancing truly spatially coherent audio-visual generation and point to future directions such as expanding environments, diversifying sound events, and exploring text-conditioned SAVG.
Abstract
This work addresses the lack of multimodal generative models capable of producing high-quality videos with spatially aligned audio. While recent advancements in generative models have been successful in video generation, they often overlook the spatial alignment between audio and visuals, which is essential for immersive experiences. To tackle this problem, we establish a new research direction in benchmarking the Spatially Aligned Audio-Video Generation (SAVG) task. We introduce a spatially aligned audio-visual dataset, whose audio and video data are curated based on whether sound events are onscreen or not. We also propose a new alignment metric that aims to evaluate the spatial alignment between audio and video. Then, using the dataset and metric, we benchmark two types of baseline methods: one is based on a joint audio-video generation model, and the other is a two-stage method that combines a video generation model and a video-to-audio generation model. Our experimental results demonstrate that gaps exist between the baseline methods and the ground truth in terms of video and audio quality, as well as spatial alignment between the two modalities.
