Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Online optimisation for dynamic electrical impedance tomography

Neil Dizon, Jyrki Jauhiainen, Tuomo Valkonen

TL;DR

This work tackles real-time dynamic inverse problems by embedding online optimisation into nonlinear time-discrete EIT via an online primal-dual proximal splitting scheme. The method handles nonconvex framewise objectives, uses a predictor to model temporal coupling, and accommodates inexact PDE solves, with regret bounds guaranteeing performance relative to the best time-varying reference. A key theoretical contribution is the second-order differentiability of the CEM solution operator on $L^\infty$, enabling rigorous smoothness-based analysis in the online setting. Numerical experiments on moving inclusions in EIT demonstrate real-time reconstructions (about 12 ms per frame) and substantial improvements over uninformed predictions, while remaining competitive with, and significantly faster than, static reconstructions like RIPGN.

Abstract

Online optimisation studies the convergence of optimisation methods as the data embedded in the problem changes. Based on this idea, we propose a primal dual online method for nonlinear time-discrete inverse problems. We analyse the method through regret theory and demonstrate its performance in real-time monitoring of moving bodies in a fluid with Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). To do so, we also prove the second-order differentiability of the Complete Electrode Model (CEM) solution operator on $L^\infty$.

Online optimisation for dynamic electrical impedance tomography

TL;DR

This work tackles real-time dynamic inverse problems by embedding online optimisation into nonlinear time-discrete EIT via an online primal-dual proximal splitting scheme. The method handles nonconvex framewise objectives, uses a predictor to model temporal coupling, and accommodates inexact PDE solves, with regret bounds guaranteeing performance relative to the best time-varying reference. A key theoretical contribution is the second-order differentiability of the CEM solution operator on , enabling rigorous smoothness-based analysis in the online setting. Numerical experiments on moving inclusions in EIT demonstrate real-time reconstructions (about 12 ms per frame) and substantial improvements over uninformed predictions, while remaining competitive with, and significantly faster than, static reconstructions like RIPGN.

Abstract

Online optimisation studies the convergence of optimisation methods as the data embedded in the problem changes. Based on this idea, we propose a primal dual online method for nonlinear time-discrete inverse problems. We analyse the method through regret theory and demonstrate its performance in real-time monitoring of moving bodies in a fluid with Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). To do so, we also prove the second-order differentiability of the Complete Electrode Model (CEM) solution operator on .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 21 sections, 15 theorems, 127 equations, 7 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Lemma 2.9

Let $N \ge 1$ and suppose ass:pd:main holds for any $0 \le k \le N$ and $u^{1:N}$ generated by alg:pd:alg for an initial $u^0 \in X_0 \times Y_0$. Then the following statements hold:

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Iteration-wise relative objective values and iterate errors in Baseline experiment.
  • Figure 2: Iteration-wise objective value and relative error in Circular Motion experiment.
  • Figure 3: A selection of reconstructed frames in Baseline and Circular Motion experiments.
  • Figure 4: Circular Motion experiment. Comparison of the reconstruction quality. Left: true target. Middle: static reconstruction with RIPGN. Right: online reconstruction with \ref{['alg:pd:alg']} and Affine prediction.
  • Figure 5: Iteration-wise objective value and relative error in Halting Motion experiment.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (35)

  • Example 2.2: Primal-dual predictors
  • Example 2.4
  • Remark 2.7
  • Remark 2.8
  • Lemma 2.9
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.10: A priori estimate
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.11: A posteriori estimate
  • proof
  • ...and 25 more