Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Thermodynamic Topology and Phase Space Analysis of AdS Black Holes Through Non-Extensive Entropy Perspectives

Saeed Noori Gashti, Behnam Pourhassan, Izzet Sakalli

TL;DR

This work investigates the thermodynamic topology of AdS Einstein-power-Yang-Mills black holes under non-extensive entropies within bulk-boundary and restricted phase space frameworks. By employing Duan's phi-mapping and a generalized free energy, the authors classify black-hole solutions through topological charges $\omega$ and track how these charges depend on non-extensive parameters ($\delta, \lambda, \alpha, \beta, K, \Delta$). Across entropies, bulk-boundary results show rich, parameter-dependent topological patterns, while in RPS the topology tends to stabilize, yielding a universal $\omega = +1$ for Rényi, Sharma-Mittal and Tsallis-Cirto (with Barrow and Kaniadakis exhibiting parameter-driven transitions). These findings offer a topological lens on entropy generalizations in holographic black-hole thermodynamics and hint at broader implications for stability analyses and non-extensive thermodynamics in gravitational systems.

Abstract

This paper studies the thermodynamic topology through the bulk-boundary and restricted phase space (RPS) frameworks. In bulk-boundary framework, we observe two topological charges $(ω= +1, -1)$ concerning the non-extensive Barrow parameter and with ($δ=0$) in Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. For Renyi entropy, different topological charges are observed depending on the value of the $λ$ with a notable transition from three topological charges $(ω= +1, -1, +1)$ to a single topological charge $(ω= +1)$ as $λ$ increases. Also, by setting $λ$ to zero results in two topological charges $(ω= +1, -1)$. Sharma-Mittal entropy exhibits three distinct ranges of topological charges influenced by the $α$ and $β$ with different classifications viz $β$ exceeds $α$, we will have $(ω= +1, -1, +1)$, $β= α$, we have $(ω= +1, -1)$ and for $α$ exceeds $β$ we face $(ω= -1)$. Also, Kaniadakis entropy shows variations in topological charges viz we observe $(ω= +1, -1)$ for any acceptable value of $K$, except when $K = 0$, where a single topological charge $(ω= -1)$. In the case of Tsallis-Cirto entropy, for small parameter $Δ$ values, we have $(ω= +1)$ and when $Δ$ increases to 0.9, we will have $(ω= +1, -1)$. When we extend our analysis to the RPS framework, we find that the topological charge consistently remains $(ω= +1)$ independent of the specific values of the free parameters for Renyi, Sharma-Mittal, and Tsallis-Cirto. Additionally, for Barrow entropy in RPS, the number of topological charges rises when $δ$ increases from 0 to 0.8. Finally for Kaniadakis entropy, at small values of $K$, we observe $(ω= +1)$. However, as the non-extensive parameter $K$ increases, we encounter different topological charges and classifications with $(ω= +1, -1)$.

Thermodynamic Topology and Phase Space Analysis of AdS Black Holes Through Non-Extensive Entropy Perspectives

TL;DR

This work investigates the thermodynamic topology of AdS Einstein-power-Yang-Mills black holes under non-extensive entropies within bulk-boundary and restricted phase space frameworks. By employing Duan's phi-mapping and a generalized free energy, the authors classify black-hole solutions through topological charges and track how these charges depend on non-extensive parameters (). Across entropies, bulk-boundary results show rich, parameter-dependent topological patterns, while in RPS the topology tends to stabilize, yielding a universal for Rényi, Sharma-Mittal and Tsallis-Cirto (with Barrow and Kaniadakis exhibiting parameter-driven transitions). These findings offer a topological lens on entropy generalizations in holographic black-hole thermodynamics and hint at broader implications for stability analyses and non-extensive thermodynamics in gravitational systems.

Abstract

This paper studies the thermodynamic topology through the bulk-boundary and restricted phase space (RPS) frameworks. In bulk-boundary framework, we observe two topological charges concerning the non-extensive Barrow parameter and with () in Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. For Renyi entropy, different topological charges are observed depending on the value of the with a notable transition from three topological charges to a single topological charge as increases. Also, by setting to zero results in two topological charges . Sharma-Mittal entropy exhibits three distinct ranges of topological charges influenced by the and with different classifications viz exceeds , we will have , , we have and for exceeds we face . Also, Kaniadakis entropy shows variations in topological charges viz we observe for any acceptable value of , except when , where a single topological charge . In the case of Tsallis-Cirto entropy, for small parameter values, we have and when increases to 0.9, we will have . When we extend our analysis to the RPS framework, we find that the topological charge consistently remains independent of the specific values of the free parameters for Renyi, Sharma-Mittal, and Tsallis-Cirto. Additionally, for Barrow entropy in RPS, the number of topological charges rises when increases from 0 to 0.8. Finally for Kaniadakis entropy, at small values of , we observe . However, as the non-extensive parameter increases, we encounter different topological charges and classifications with .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 22 sections, 52 equations, 10 figures.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: The curve represented by Equation (\ref{['BB4']}) is illustrated in Figures (\ref{['1a']}), (\ref{['1c']}), (\ref{['1e']}), and (\ref{['1g']}). In Figures (\ref{['1b']}), (\ref{['1d']}), (\ref{['1f']}), and (\ref{['1h']}), the zero points (ZPs) are positioned at coordinates $(r, \theta)$ with nonextensive parameter $\delta$.
  • Figure 2: The curve represented by Equation (\ref{['BR3']}) is shown in Figures (\ref{['2a']}), (\ref{['2c']}), (\ref{['2e']}), and (\ref{['2g']}). In Figures (\ref{['2b']}), (\ref{['2d']}), (\ref{['2f']}), and (\ref{['2h']}), the zero points (ZPs) are positioned at coordinates $(r, \theta)$ with nonextensive parameter $\lambda$.
  • Figure 3: The curve represented by Equation (\ref{['BSM3']}) is depicted in Figures (\ref{['3a']}), (\ref{['3c']}), and (\ref{['3e']}). In Figures (\ref{['3b']}), (\ref{['3d']}), and (\ref{['3f']}), the zero points (ZPs) are positioned at coordinates $(r, \theta)$ with nonextensive parameters $(\alpha)$ and $(\beta)$.
  • Figure 4: The curve represented by Equation (\ref{['BK3']}) is shown in Figures (\ref{['4a']}), (\ref{['4c']}), (\ref{['4e']}), and (\ref{['4g']}). In Figures (\ref{['4b']}), (\ref{['4d']}), (\ref{['4f']}), and (\ref{['4h']}), the zero points (ZPs) are positioned at coordinates $(r, \theta)$ with nonextensive parameter $K$.
  • Figure 5: The curve represented by Equation (\ref{['BTC3']}) is depicted in Figures (\ref{['5a']}), (\ref{['5c']}), and (\ref{['5e']}). In Figures (\ref{['5b']}), (\ref{['5d']}), and (\ref{['5f']}), the zero points (ZPs) are positioned at coordinates $(r, \theta)$ on the circular loops with nonextensive parameter $\Delta$.
  • ...and 5 more figures