Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Torsion-free $H$-structures on almost Abelian solvmanifolds

Marco Freibert

TL;DR

The paper develops a general linear-algebraic framework to characterize when almost Abelian solvmanifolds $\Gamma\backslash G$ admit torsion-free $H$-structures for broad classes of $H\le\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{R})$. It introduces the subspace $\mathcal{F}_{\mathfrak{h}}\subseteq\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})$ as the image of a linear map attached to $H$-connections, and shows $\tilde{\mathfrak{k}}_{\mathfrak{h}}\subseteq\mathcal{F}_{\mathfrak{h}}$, with equality in many cases yielding left-invariant flatness as the torsion-free condition. The work systematically analyzes subalgebras commuting with a fixed endomorphism, complex vs totally real vs hyperparacomplex vs unitary cases, and subalgebras with special first prolongations $\mathcal{K}_{\mathfrak{h}}^{(1)}$, providing explicit descriptions of $\mathcal{F}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ in representative settings. Across these sections, the authors recover and extend known characterizations for structures such as complex, Kähler, complex-symplectic, hypercomplex, hyperkähler, and G2-related geometries, and they unify conditions under which torsion-free implies left-invariant flatness. The results enable a broad, unified criterion to identify torsion-free invariant geometries on almost Abelian solvmanifolds and illuminate when flatness and torsion-freeness coincide for large classes of $H$.

Abstract

In this article, we provide a general set-up for arbitrary linear Lie groups $H\leq \mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{R})$ which allows to characterise the almost Abelian Lie algebras admitting a torsion-free $H$-structure. In more concrete terms, using that an $n$-dimensional almost Abelian Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{g}_f$ is fully determined by an endomorphism $f$ of $\mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we give a description of the subspace $\mathcal{F}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ of all $f\in\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})$ for which $\mathfrak{g}_f$ admits a ``special'' torsion-free $H$-structure in terms of the image of a certain linear map. For large classes of linear Lie groups $H$, we are able to explicitly compute $\mathcal{F}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ and so give characterisations of the almost Abelian Lie algebras admitting a torsion-free $H$-structure. Our results reprove all the known characterisations of the almost Abelian Lie algebras admitting a torsion-free $H$-structure for different single linear Lie groups $H$ and extends them to big classes of linear Lie groups $H$. For example, we are able to provide characterisations in the case $n=2m$, $H\leq \mathrm{GL}(m,\mathbb{C})$ and $H$ either being a complex Lie group or being totally real, or in the case that $H$ preserves a pseudo-Riemannian metric. In many cases, we show that the space $\mathcal{F}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ coincides with what we call the \emph{characteristic subalgebra} $\tilde{\mathfrak{k}}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ associated to $\mathfrak{h}$, and that then the torsion-free condition is equivalent to the left-invariant flatness condition. In particular, we prove this to be the case if $H$ is a complex linear Lie group or if $\mathfrak{h}$ does not contain any elements of rank one or two and is either metric or totally real.

Torsion-free $H$-structures on almost Abelian solvmanifolds

TL;DR

The paper develops a general linear-algebraic framework to characterize when almost Abelian solvmanifolds admit torsion-free -structures for broad classes of . It introduces the subspace as the image of a linear map attached to -connections, and shows , with equality in many cases yielding left-invariant flatness as the torsion-free condition. The work systematically analyzes subalgebras commuting with a fixed endomorphism, complex vs totally real vs hyperparacomplex vs unitary cases, and subalgebras with special first prolongations , providing explicit descriptions of in representative settings. Across these sections, the authors recover and extend known characterizations for structures such as complex, Kähler, complex-symplectic, hypercomplex, hyperkähler, and G2-related geometries, and they unify conditions under which torsion-free implies left-invariant flatness. The results enable a broad, unified criterion to identify torsion-free invariant geometries on almost Abelian solvmanifolds and illuminate when flatness and torsion-freeness coincide for large classes of .

Abstract

In this article, we provide a general set-up for arbitrary linear Lie groups which allows to characterise the almost Abelian Lie algebras admitting a torsion-free -structure. In more concrete terms, using that an -dimensional almost Abelian Lie algebra is fully determined by an endomorphism of , we give a description of the subspace of all for which admits a ``special'' torsion-free -structure in terms of the image of a certain linear map. For large classes of linear Lie groups , we are able to explicitly compute and so give characterisations of the almost Abelian Lie algebras admitting a torsion-free -structure. Our results reprove all the known characterisations of the almost Abelian Lie algebras admitting a torsion-free -structure for different single linear Lie groups and extends them to big classes of linear Lie groups . For example, we are able to provide characterisations in the case , and either being a complex Lie group or being totally real, or in the case that preserves a pseudo-Riemannian metric. In many cases, we show that the space coincides with what we call the \emph{characteristic subalgebra} associated to , and that then the torsion-free condition is equivalent to the left-invariant flatness condition. In particular, we prove this to be the case if is a complex linear Lie group or if does not contain any elements of rank one or two and is either metric or totally real.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 59 theorems, 167 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Any almost Abelian Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ admits product structures of any possible signature and also tangent structures.

Theorems & Definitions (157)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Definition 1.4
  • Lemma 1.5
  • ...and 147 more