Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Two portals to GeV sterile neutrinos : dipole versus mixing

Enrico Bertuzzo, Michele Frigerio

Abstract

Massive sterile neutrinos, also known as heavy neutral leptons, can have a mixing with active neutrinos, $θ$, as well as a dipole coupling to the photon, $d$. We study the interplay between these two portals, considering the production from meson decays of sterile neutrinos with mass $0.1$ GeV $\lesssim M_N \lesssim 10$ GeV, at beam-dump facilities such as NA62 and SHiP, and at the FASER2 experiment. These sterile neutrinos can be long-lived and decay into a photon in a distant detector, via the dipole operator. We find that all these experiments will be sensitive to values of $d$ which are presently unconstrained. The experimental reach varies strongly with the mass $M_N$ and the mixing $θ$, and one observes specific correlations with the flavour of active neutrinos. The SHiP experiment will mark a jump in sensitivity: (i) it will probe a sterile dipole as small as $d\sim 10^{-8}$ GeV$^{-1}$, thus testing new physics well above the electroweak scale; (ii) it may detect the active-sterile dipole to the level predicted by electroweak loops, if $θ$ is close to the present bound.

Two portals to GeV sterile neutrinos : dipole versus mixing

Abstract

Massive sterile neutrinos, also known as heavy neutral leptons, can have a mixing with active neutrinos, , as well as a dipole coupling to the photon, . We study the interplay between these two portals, considering the production from meson decays of sterile neutrinos with mass GeV GeV, at beam-dump facilities such as NA62 and SHiP, and at the FASER2 experiment. These sterile neutrinos can be long-lived and decay into a photon in a distant detector, via the dipole operator. We find that all these experiments will be sensitive to values of which are presently unconstrained. The experimental reach varies strongly with the mass and the mixing , and one observes specific correlations with the flavour of active neutrinos. The SHiP experiment will mark a jump in sensitivity: (i) it will probe a sterile dipole as small as GeV, thus testing new physics well above the electroweak scale; (ii) it may detect the active-sterile dipole to the level predicted by electroweak loops, if is close to the present bound.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 66 equations, 6 figures.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Regions in which $N_2$ production is dominated by the dipole, $N_d > N_\theta$ (above the blue lines), and where $N_2$ decays are dominated by the dipole, $\Gamma_d > \Gamma_\theta$ (above the orange lines), for three different values of $M_1$. The light blue/orange colour shading corresponds to the case $M_1=1$ GeV. In the wine (white) region, the dipole (the mixing) dominates both $N_2$ production and decays. We focused on the SHiP case, fixing a mass splitting $\delta=0~(0.1)$ in the upper (lower) panels, and non-zero mixing with a single flavour, $\theta_{i\tau} \neq 0$ ($\theta_{i\mu}\neq 0$) in the left (right) panels. The lower (upper) horizontal dashed gray line corresponds to a dipole generate by new physics at scale $m_*= 1$ TeV in a weak (strong) coupling regime, $g_*=1$ ($g_*=4\pi$). The vertical dashed gray line is the maximal allowed mixing for $M_1=1$ GeV (in the mixing-only scenario).
  • Figure 2: Same as in Fig. \ref{['fig:dipole_dominance_delta']}, but for different choices of parameters. In the upper panels, we focus on the SHiP experiment and fix $M_1 = 1$ GeV, while considering three different values of $\delta$ (the shading corresponds to $\delta=0$). In the lower panels, we fix $M_1 = 1$ GeV and $\delta = 0.1$, and compare the SHiP and FASER2 experiments (the shading corresponds to SHiP). The curves for NA62 (not shown) basically coincide with those for SHiP.
  • Figure 3: Sensitivity to the photon signal of the future experiments FASER2, NA62 and SHiP (coloured lines) and regions excluded by the past experiments CHARM-II and BEBC (coloured regions), fixing $\delta = 0.1$ and either no mixing (upper panel) or mixing with the $\tau$ flavour (middle panel). We also show the regions excluded by limits from supernovæ (SN) and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN). The lower (upper) horizontal dashed gray line corresponds to a dipole generate by new physics at scale $m_*= 1$ TeV in a weak (strong) coupling regime, $g_*=1$ ($g_*=4\pi$). The lower panel shows the number of events generated by the EW dipole (limit $d\to 0$), for the same parameters as in the middle panel. When $N_{events}>3$ (dashed horizontal line), the corresponding sensitivity extends to arbitrarily small values of $d$ (vertical region in the middle panel).
  • Figure 4: Upper panel: Same as in the middle panel of Fig. \ref{['fig:sensitivity1']}, but choosing $\delta = 0$ (instead of $\delta=0.1$). Middle panel: same as the upper panel, but mixing with the $\mu$ flavour (instead of the $\tau$ flavour). Lower panel: number of events generated by the EW dipole, for the same parameters as in the middle panel, but in the limit $d\to 0$.
  • Figure 5: Sensitivity of the SHiP experiment to the dipole coefficient, as a function of the lightest sterile mass. In the upper panel, we consider a mixing with the $\mu$ flavour only, and vary the mass splitting $\delta$. In the lower panel, we set $\delta$ to zero, and consider a mixing with various combinations of lepton flavours. For definiteness, the SN excluded region corresponds to the universal mixing case (black) and the BBN excluded region to the electron mixing (green).
  • ...and 1 more figures