What Makes Cryptic Crosswords Challenging for LLMs?
Abdelrahman Sadallah, Daria Kotova, Ekaterina Kochmar
TL;DR
This work investigates why modern LLMs struggle with cryptic crosswords, proposing a targeted, interpretability-focused evaluation. It benchmarks Gemma2, LLaMA3, and ChatGPT on cryptic clues using zero-shot prompts and dissects performance via three auxiliary tasks: definition extraction, wordplay-type detection, and explanation extraction. The authors introduce a small, annotated wordplay-dataset and provide a reproducible codebase and data; results show that despite some gains from prompting strategies and task decomposition, LLMs remain far below human performance, especially in wordplay understanding. They discuss future directions such as chain-of-thought and curriculum learning to bridge the gap and acknowledge dataset and contamination limitations.
Abstract
Cryptic crosswords are puzzles that rely on general knowledge and the solver's ability to manipulate language on different levels, dealing with various types of wordplay. Previous research suggests that solving such puzzles is challenging even for modern NLP models, including Large Language Models (LLMs). However, there is little to no research on the reasons for their poor performance on this task. In this paper, we establish the benchmark results for three popular LLMs: Gemma2, LLaMA3 and ChatGPT, showing that their performance on this task is still significantly below that of humans. We also investigate why these models struggle to achieve superior performance. We release our code and introduced datasets at https://github.com/bodasadallah/decrypting-crosswords.
