Logo
ScienceStack
Table of Contents
Fetching ...
Sign In

Identifying the Barriers to Human-Centered Design in the Workplace: Perspectives from UX Professionals

Tim Gorichanaz

TL;DR

The study addresses why human-centered design sometimes fails in industry by uncovering workplace contexts that inhibit HCD. It employs Q methodology with 14 US-based UX professionals to derive a 39-statement Q-set and identifies five factors—Single-Minded Arrogance, Competing Visions, Moving Fast and Breaking Things, Pragmatically Getting By, and Sidestepping Responsibility—that explain 75% of variance. Two core dimensions, speed and clarity of vision, underlie these factors and map to spaces where HCD can be strengthened or weakened. The work contributes a practice-oriented framework for education, diagnostics, and organizational culture change, and suggests interventions to cultivate a design culture and organizational humility to better enable ethical, human-centered design in practice.

Abstract

Human-centered design, a theoretical ideal, is sometimes compromised in industry practice. Technology firms juggle competing priorities, such as adopting new technologies and generating shareholder returns, which may conflict with human-centered design values. This study sought to identify the types of workplace situations that present barriers for human-centered design, going beyond the views and behaviors of individual professionals. Q methodology was used to analyze the experiences of 14 UX professionals based in the United States. Five factors were identified, representing workplace situations in which human-centered design is inhibited, despite the involvement of UX professionals: Single-Minded Arrogance, Competing Visions, Moving Fast and Breaking Things, Pragmatically Getting By, and Sidestepping Responsibility. Underpinning these five factors are the dimensions of speed and clarity of vision. This paper demonstrates connections between the literature on UX ethics and human-centered design practice, and its findings point toward opportunities for education and intervention to better enable human-centered and ethical design in practice.

Identifying the Barriers to Human-Centered Design in the Workplace: Perspectives from UX Professionals

TL;DR

The study addresses why human-centered design sometimes fails in industry by uncovering workplace contexts that inhibit HCD. It employs Q methodology with 14 US-based UX professionals to derive a 39-statement Q-set and identifies five factors—Single-Minded Arrogance, Competing Visions, Moving Fast and Breaking Things, Pragmatically Getting By, and Sidestepping Responsibility—that explain 75% of variance. Two core dimensions, speed and clarity of vision, underlie these factors and map to spaces where HCD can be strengthened or weakened. The work contributes a practice-oriented framework for education, diagnostics, and organizational culture change, and suggests interventions to cultivate a design culture and organizational humility to better enable ethical, human-centered design in practice.

Abstract

Human-centered design, a theoretical ideal, is sometimes compromised in industry practice. Technology firms juggle competing priorities, such as adopting new technologies and generating shareholder returns, which may conflict with human-centered design values. This study sought to identify the types of workplace situations that present barriers for human-centered design, going beyond the views and behaviors of individual professionals. Q methodology was used to analyze the experiences of 14 UX professionals based in the United States. Five factors were identified, representing workplace situations in which human-centered design is inhibited, despite the involvement of UX professionals: Single-Minded Arrogance, Competing Visions, Moving Fast and Breaking Things, Pragmatically Getting By, and Sidestepping Responsibility. Underpinning these five factors are the dimensions of speed and clarity of vision. This paper demonstrates connections between the literature on UX ethics and human-centered design practice, and its findings point toward opportunities for education and intervention to better enable human-centered and ethical design in practice.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 23 sections, 2 figures, 4 tables.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Related Work
  3. The Paradigm of Human-Centered Design
  4. UX in Practice
  5. UX Practice and Ethics
  6. Ethically Mediating Factors in UX Practice
  7. Drilling Down on "Applied Ethics": Macroethics and Microethics
  8. Research Approach
  9. Developing the Q-set
  10. Selecting the P-set
  11. Gathering Q-sorts
  12. Analyzing the Q-sorts
  13. Findings
  14. Single-Minded Arrogance (Factor 1)
  15. Competing Visions (Factor 2)
  16. ...and 8 more sections

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: The five factors mapped in a two-by-two matrix according to the dimensions of speed (slow or fast) and clarity of vision (muddy or clear). The formatting indicates the dimension that most strongly defines a given factor.
  • Figure 2: The five factors mapped on a coordinate plane with the axes of speed and clarity of vision.