Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class in $\mathbb{A}\mathrm{d}\mathbb{S}^{2,1}$

Jinsung Park

TL;DR

This work develops a symplectic and complex-geometric framework for maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class in 3D Anti-de Sitter space. By modeling these discs via the cotangent bundle $T^*T_0(1)$ over the Weil-Petersson universal Teichmüller space and employing the Mess map, it shows a symplectic diffeomorphism to $T_0(1)\times T_0(1)$, with the canonical form equating to the difference of pullbacks of WP forms. The anti-holomorphic energies of induced Gauss maps act as Kahler potentials on natural submanifolds $T_0(1)^{\pm}$, linking to maximal WP discs and the Loewner energy, and establishing a bridge between Teichmüller theory, AdS geometry, and symplectic geometry. These results illuminate how WP geometry governs the moduli of maximal AdS discs and provide a precise variational framework for the associated energies and deformations.

Abstract

We introduce maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class in the 3-dimensional Anti-de Sitter space $\mathbb{A}\mathrm{d}\mathbb{S}^{2,1}$, whose parametrization space can be identified with the cotangent bundle $T^*T_0(1)$ of Weil-Petersson universal Teichmüller space $T_0(1)$. We prove that the Mess map defines a symplectic diffeomorphism from $T^*T_0(1)$ to $T_0(1)\times T_0(1)$, with respect to the canonical symplectic form on $T^*T_0(1)$ and the difference of pullbacks of the Weil-Petersson symplectic forms from each factor of $T_0(1)\times T_0(1)$. Furthermore, we show that the functional given by the anti-holomorphic energies of the induced Gauss maps associated with maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class serves as a Kähler potential for the restriction of the canonical symplectic form to certain submanifolds $T_0(1)^\pm \subset T^*T_0(1)$, which bijectively parametrize the space of maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class in $\mathbb{A}\mathrm{d}\mathbb{S}^{2,1}$.

Maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class in $\mathbb{A}\mathrm{d}\mathbb{S}^{2,1}$

TL;DR

This work develops a symplectic and complex-geometric framework for maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class in 3D Anti-de Sitter space. By modeling these discs via the cotangent bundle over the Weil-Petersson universal Teichmüller space and employing the Mess map, it shows a symplectic diffeomorphism to , with the canonical form equating to the difference of pullbacks of WP forms. The anti-holomorphic energies of induced Gauss maps act as Kahler potentials on natural submanifolds , linking to maximal WP discs and the Loewner energy, and establishing a bridge between Teichmüller theory, AdS geometry, and symplectic geometry. These results illuminate how WP geometry governs the moduli of maximal AdS discs and provide a precise variational framework for the associated energies and deformations.

Abstract

We introduce maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class in the 3-dimensional Anti-de Sitter space , whose parametrization space can be identified with the cotangent bundle of Weil-Petersson universal Teichmüller space . We prove that the Mess map defines a symplectic diffeomorphism from to , with respect to the canonical symplectic form on and the difference of pullbacks of the Weil-Petersson symplectic forms from each factor of . Furthermore, we show that the functional given by the anti-holomorphic energies of the induced Gauss maps associated with maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class serves as a Kähler potential for the restriction of the canonical symplectic form to certain submanifolds , which bijectively parametrize the space of maximal discs of Weil-Petersson class in .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 26 theorems, 181 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

The map is a symplectic diffeomorphism. That is, where $\mathrm{Mess}_\pm:= \pi_{\pm}\circ \mathrm{Mess}$, and $\pi_\pm$ denote the projection maps from $T_0(1)\times T_0(1)$ onto the first or second factors, respectively.

Theorems & Definitions (58)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.3
  • Proposition 3.4
  • Proposition 3.5
  • ...and 48 more