Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A CT Image Denoising Method Based on Projection Domain Feature

Mengyu Sun, Dimeng Xia, Shusen Zhao, Weibin Zhang, Yaobin He

TL;DR

The paper tackles noise in industrial CT projections when increasing exposure or sampling is restricted. It proposes a projection-domain denoising approach that exploits similarity between neighboring views and uses singular value decomposition on grouped projections, complemented by eigenvalue screening via a threshold $\varepsilon$ to suppress noise while preserving structure, with reconstructions performed by SART. Key contributions include a practical, prior-free denoising module that reduces computation relative to iterative methods and can act as a plug-in to enhance other denoising techniques, demonstrated on both simulated and real battery CT data. The work offers a path to higher-quality CT reconstructions in industrial settings with limited acquisition time or dose, without requiring large training datasets.

Abstract

In order to improve image quality of projection in industrial applications, generally, a standard method is to increase the current or exposure time, which might cause overexposure of detector units in areas of thin objects or backgrounds. Increasing the projection sampling is a better method to address the issue, but it also leads to significant noise in the reconstructed image. This paper proposed a projection domain denoising algorithm based on the features of the projection domain for this case. This algorithm utilized the similarity of projections of neighboring veiws to reduce image noise quickly and effectively. The availability of the algorithm proposed in this work has been conducted by numerical simulation and practical data experiments.

A CT Image Denoising Method Based on Projection Domain Feature

TL;DR

The paper tackles noise in industrial CT projections when increasing exposure or sampling is restricted. It proposes a projection-domain denoising approach that exploits similarity between neighboring views and uses singular value decomposition on grouped projections, complemented by eigenvalue screening via a threshold to suppress noise while preserving structure, with reconstructions performed by SART. Key contributions include a practical, prior-free denoising module that reduces computation relative to iterative methods and can act as a plug-in to enhance other denoising techniques, demonstrated on both simulated and real battery CT data. The work offers a path to higher-quality CT reconstructions in industrial settings with limited acquisition time or dose, without requiring large training datasets.

Abstract

In order to improve image quality of projection in industrial applications, generally, a standard method is to increase the current or exposure time, which might cause overexposure of detector units in areas of thin objects or backgrounds. Increasing the projection sampling is a better method to address the issue, but it also leads to significant noise in the reconstructed image. This paper proposed a projection domain denoising algorithm based on the features of the projection domain for this case. This algorithm utilized the similarity of projections of neighboring veiws to reduce image noise quickly and effectively. The availability of the algorithm proposed in this work has been conducted by numerical simulation and practical data experiments.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 4 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Comparison of denoising results for simulated square shell battery data. (a) reference image, (b) noisy simulation, (c) denoised with TV-L1, (d) denoised with NWTV, (e) denoised with the proposed algorithm. All images are reconstructed by SART and displayed with window level [0, 1.1].
  • Figure 2: Partial magnification of each method in Figure 1. (a) noisy simulation, (b) denoised with TV-L1, (c) denoised with NWTV, (d) denoised with the proposed algorithm. The yellow and blue arrows indicate the edges of the structure. All images are reconstructed by SART and displayed with window level [0, 1.1].
  • Figure 3: Experimental setup of the battery scanning.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of denoising results for collected power battery data. (a) reconstruction result without process, (b) denoised with TV-L1, (c) denoised with NWTV, (d) denoised with the proposed algorithm. All images are reconstructed by SART and displayed with window level [0, 0.05].
  • Figure 5: Partial magnification of each method in Figure 4. (a) reconstruction result without process, (b) denoised with TV-L1, (c) denoised with NWTV, (d) denoised with the proposed algorithm. The yellow and blue arrows indicate the edges of the structure. All images are reconstructed by SART and displayed with window level [0, 0.04].