Black Swan: Abductive and Defeasible Video Reasoning in Unpredictable Events
Aditya Chinchure, Sahithya Ravi, Raymond Ng, Vered Shwartz, Boyang Li, Leonid Sigal
TL;DR
BlackSwanSuite introduces a focused benchmark for abductive and defeasible video reasoning in unpredictable events, structured around Forecaster, Detective, and Reporter tasks that manipulate visual information access to elicit nuanced reasoning. The dataset combines 1,655 short videos from the Oops! dataset with 15,469 questions across generative, MCQ, and Y/N formats, enabling evaluation of perception, comprehension, and reasoning. Across both open- and closed-source VLMs, humans consistently outperform models on abductive and defeasible tasks, revealing substantial gaps in current architectures and training. The work highlights the need for improved perception, reasoning, and potentially novel training regimes to enable robust, defeasible video understanding with safe autonomous decision-making implications.
Abstract
The commonsense reasoning capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs), especially in abductive reasoning and defeasible reasoning, remain poorly understood. Most benchmarks focus on typical visual scenarios, making it difficult to discern whether model performance stems from keen perception and reasoning skills, or reliance on pure statistical recall. We argue that by focusing on atypical events in videos, clearer insights can be gained on the core capabilities of VLMs. Explaining and understanding such out-of-distribution events requires models to extend beyond basic pattern recognition and regurgitation of their prior knowledge. To this end, we introduce BlackSwanSuite, a benchmark for evaluating VLMs' ability to reason about unexpected events through abductive and defeasible tasks. Our tasks artificially limit the amount of visual information provided to models while questioning them about hidden unexpected events, or provide new visual information that could change an existing hypothesis about the event. We curate a comprehensive benchmark suite comprising over 3,800 MCQ, 4,900 generative and 6,700 yes/no questions, spanning 1,655 videos. After extensively evaluating various state-of-the-art VLMs, including GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro, as well as open-source VLMs such as LLaVA-Video, we find significant performance gaps of up to 32% from humans on these tasks. Our findings reveal key limitations in current VLMs, emphasizing the need for enhanced model architectures and training strategies. Our data and leaderboard is available at blackswan.cs.ubc.ca.
