Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Parametric, Second-Order Cone Representable Model of Fairness for Decision-Making Problems

Kaarthik Sundar, Deepjyoti Deka, Russell Bent

TL;DR

This paper introduces $\varepsilon$-fairness, a parametric, convex fairness model that can be embedded into optimization problems via a single SOC constraint, without altering problem complexity. It grounds the model in finite-dimensional norm equivalence and establishes a closed-form link to the Jain et al. fairness index, enabling direct interpretation of fairness levels. The authors prove monotonicity of the objective with respect to fairness and define a feasibility domain, providing practical means to navigate efficiency-fairness trade-offs. A detailed case study on a damaged DC power network demonstrates how $\varepsilon$-fairness shapes load-shed distributions and quantifies the associated efficiency loss, offering a scalable tool for fair decision-making in engineering systems. The work lays a foundation for applying SOC-based fairness across domains and motivates future extensions to weighted fairness and combinatorial problems.

Abstract

The article develops a parametric model of fairness called "$\varepsilon$-fairness" that can be represented using a single second-order cone constraint and incorporated into existing decision-making problem formulations without impacting the complexity of solution techniques. We develop the model from the fundamental result of finite-dimensional norm equivalence in linear algebra and show that this model has a closed-form relationship to an existing metric for measuring fairness widely used in the literature. Finally, a simple case study on the optimal operation of a damaged power transmission network illustrates its effectiveness.

A Parametric, Second-Order Cone Representable Model of Fairness for Decision-Making Problems

TL;DR

This paper introduces -fairness, a parametric, convex fairness model that can be embedded into optimization problems via a single SOC constraint, without altering problem complexity. It grounds the model in finite-dimensional norm equivalence and establishes a closed-form link to the Jain et al. fairness index, enabling direct interpretation of fairness levels. The authors prove monotonicity of the objective with respect to fairness and define a feasibility domain, providing practical means to navigate efficiency-fairness trade-offs. A detailed case study on a damaged DC power network demonstrates how -fairness shapes load-shed distributions and quantifies the associated efficiency loss, offering a scalable tool for fair decision-making in engineering systems. The work lays a foundation for applying SOC-based fairness across domains and motivates future extensions to weighted fairness and combinatorial problems.

Abstract

The article develops a parametric model of fairness called "-fairness" that can be represented using a single second-order cone constraint and incorporated into existing decision-making problem formulations without impacting the complexity of solution techniques. We develop the model from the fundamental result of finite-dimensional norm equivalence in linear algebra and show that this model has a closed-form relationship to an existing metric for measuring fairness widely used in the literature. Finally, a simple case study on the optimal operation of a damaged power transmission network illustrates its effectiveness.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 3 theorems, 24 equations, 6 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

proposition thmcounterproposition

Given $\bar{\varepsilon} \in [0, 1]$, if the problem eq:contribution is infeasible, then it is also infeasible for any $\varepsilon \in [\bar{\varepsilon}, 1]$.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Plot of $\mathrm{JI}(\bm u) = w(\varepsilon)$ when $n = 10$.
  • Figure 2: Box plot of load shed obtained by solving the fair version of the MLS problem \ref{['eq:fair-mls']} for different values of $\varepsilon$. Notice that when $\varepsilon = 0.0$, \ref{['eq:fair-mls']} and \ref{['eq:opt-mls']} are equivalent.
  • Figure 3: Jain et al. index of the load shed values for varying values of $\varepsilon$.
  • Figure 4: Jain et al. index of the load shed values for varying values of $p$ in Eq. \ref{['eq:p-norm-mls']}. Observe that the monotonicity of the index values with respect to $p$ does not hold.
  • Figure 5: Relative loss in efficiency (%) as a function of $\varepsilon$.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • definition thmcounterdefinition
  • proposition thmcounterproposition
  • proof
  • proposition thmcounterproposition
  • proof
  • proposition thmcounterproposition
  • proof