Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Considerations Influencing Offense-Defense Dynamics From Artificial Intelligence

Giulio Corsi, Kyle Kilian, Richard Mallah

TL;DR

The paper addresses the dual-use risks and benefits of advanced AI by introducing the Offense-Defense Dynamics Framework and a six-element taxonomy that maps how AI capabilities, access, adaptability, diffusion, safeguards, and sociotechnical context interact to tilt outcomes toward societal harm or protection. It operationalizes the framework through definitions and applied analysis of disinformation generation and detection, illustrating how each element influences offensive and defensive uses. The work provides policy-relevant insights for governance, regulation, and international cooperation, aiming to guide resource allocation and interventions that enhance defense while limiting offense. By outlining paths for empirical validation, modeling, and case studies, the paper offers a structured foundation for future research and practical risk management in AI deployment.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies presents profound challenges to societal safety. As AI systems become more capable, accessible, and integrated into critical services, the dual nature of their potential is increasingly clear. While AI can enhance defensive capabilities in areas like threat detection, risk assessment, and automated security operations, it also presents avenues for malicious exploitation and large-scale societal harm, for example through automated influence operations and cyber attacks. Understanding the dynamics that shape AI's capacity to both cause harm and enhance protective measures is essential for informed decision-making regarding the deployment, use, and integration of advanced AI systems. This paper builds on recent work on offense-defense dynamics within the realm of AI, proposing a taxonomy to map and examine the key factors that influence whether AI systems predominantly pose threats or offer protective benefits to society. By establishing a shared terminology and conceptual foundation for analyzing these interactions, this work seeks to facilitate further research and discourse in this critical area.

Considerations Influencing Offense-Defense Dynamics From Artificial Intelligence

TL;DR

The paper addresses the dual-use risks and benefits of advanced AI by introducing the Offense-Defense Dynamics Framework and a six-element taxonomy that maps how AI capabilities, access, adaptability, diffusion, safeguards, and sociotechnical context interact to tilt outcomes toward societal harm or protection. It operationalizes the framework through definitions and applied analysis of disinformation generation and detection, illustrating how each element influences offensive and defensive uses. The work provides policy-relevant insights for governance, regulation, and international cooperation, aiming to guide resource allocation and interventions that enhance defense while limiting offense. By outlining paths for empirical validation, modeling, and case studies, the paper offers a structured foundation for future research and practical risk management in AI deployment.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies presents profound challenges to societal safety. As AI systems become more capable, accessible, and integrated into critical services, the dual nature of their potential is increasingly clear. While AI can enhance defensive capabilities in areas like threat detection, risk assessment, and automated security operations, it also presents avenues for malicious exploitation and large-scale societal harm, for example through automated influence operations and cyber attacks. Understanding the dynamics that shape AI's capacity to both cause harm and enhance protective measures is essential for informed decision-making regarding the deployment, use, and integration of advanced AI systems. This paper builds on recent work on offense-defense dynamics within the realm of AI, proposing a taxonomy to map and examine the key factors that influence whether AI systems predominantly pose threats or offer protective benefits to society. By establishing a shared terminology and conceptual foundation for analyzing these interactions, this work seeks to facilitate further research and discourse in this critical area.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections.