Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Note on Power-OTMs

Merlin Carl

TL;DR

This work introduces power-OTMs, OTMs augmented with a power-set operator, and develops a realizability framework based on them. By defining F-OTM-programs with F-encodings and coding-stable semantics, the authors show that power-OTMs can enumerate entire $V$-levels, making power-computability equivalent to power-recognizability and linking these notions to a $\Sigma_{2}$-definability perspective when ordinal parameters are used. A key focus is the realizability of axioms, especially the axiom of choice, which becomes independent of ZFC in this setting, being true under $V=L$ but not in all models (e.g., when $V\neq \text{HOD}$). The paper also introduces the halting problem for power-OTMs and discusses how the computational landscape differs from Set Register Machines, while outlining potential directions for further study on reducibility, clockable ordinals, and degree structures in the power-OTM realm.

Abstract

We consider the computational strength of Power-OTMs, i.e., ordinal Turing machines equipped with a power set operator, and study a notion of realizability based on these machines. When parameters are allowed, these machines are, modulo access to a global well-ordering, equivalent to the Set Register Machines defined by Robert Passmann in \cite{Passmann}, and while most of the results on the realizability of Power-OTMs are analogous to results obtained by Passmann, the settings lead to different results concerning the axiom of choice. As we will see, the computational strength of power-OTMs can, depending on the set-theoretical background, also differ from that of Set Register Machines.

A Note on Power-OTMs

TL;DR

This work introduces power-OTMs, OTMs augmented with a power-set operator, and develops a realizability framework based on them. By defining F-OTM-programs with F-encodings and coding-stable semantics, the authors show that power-OTMs can enumerate entire -levels, making power-computability equivalent to power-recognizability and linking these notions to a -definability perspective when ordinal parameters are used. A key focus is the realizability of axioms, especially the axiom of choice, which becomes independent of ZFC in this setting, being true under but not in all models (e.g., when ). The paper also introduces the halting problem for power-OTMs and discusses how the computational landscape differs from Set Register Machines, while outlining potential directions for further study on reducibility, clockable ordinals, and degree structures in the power-OTM realm.

Abstract

We consider the computational strength of Power-OTMs, i.e., ordinal Turing machines equipped with a power set operator, and study a notion of realizability based on these machines. When parameters are allowed, these machines are, modulo access to a global well-ordering, equivalent to the Set Register Machines defined by Robert Passmann in \cite{Passmann}, and while most of the results on the realizability of Power-OTMs are analogous to results obtained by Passmann, the settings lead to different results concerning the axiom of choice. As we will see, the computational strength of power-OTMs can, depending on the set-theoretical background, also differ from that of Set Register Machines.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 14 theorems, 3 equations.

Key Result

lemma 1

[Cf. Passmann, Passmann]

Theorems & Definitions (33)

  • Definition 1
  • remark 1
  • lemma 1
  • proof
  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2
  • proof
  • remark 2
  • Definition 2
  • ...and 23 more