Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Recovering implicit physics model under real-world constraints

Ayan Banerjee, Sandeep K. S. Gupta

TL;DR

This paper tackles the problem of recovering underlying physics from real-world dynamical data where sampling is sub-Nyquist, measurements are incomplete, and external human inputs introduce timing and magnitude uncertainties. It introduces LTC-NN-MR, a neural-architecture extension that uses a dense layer and ODE-solver–based loss to infer sparse, implicit model coefficients while handling perturbations and input-timing errors through input-shift search. The approach addresses five real-world constraints (C1–C5) and demonstrates superior accuracy in recovering model coefficients and reconstructions across multiple simulation and real-world benchmarks, including AID and EEG datasets. The results suggest LTC-NN-MR provides a robust, scalable pathway for safe, real-time digital twins and human-in-the-loop control, with attention to practical ethics in deployment.

Abstract

Recovering a physics-driven model, i.e. a governing set of equations of the underlying dynamical systems, from the real-world data has been of recent interest. Most existing methods either operate on simulation data with unrealistically high sampling rates or require explicit measurements of all system variables, which is not amenable in real-world deployments. Moreover, they assume the timestamps of external perturbations to the physical system are known a priori, without uncertainty, implicitly discounting any sensor time-synchronization or human reporting errors. In this paper, we propose a novel liquid time constant neural network (LTC-NN) based architecture to recover underlying model of physical dynamics from real-world data. The automatic differentiation property of LTC-NN nodes overcomes problems associated with low sampling rates, the input dependent time constant in the forward pass of the hidden layer of LTC-NN nodes creates a massive search space of implicit physical dynamics, the physics model solver based data reconstruction loss guides the search for the correct set of implicit dynamics, and the use of the dropout regularization in the dense layer ensures extraction of the sparsest model. Further, to account for the perturbation timing error, we utilize dense layer nodes to search through input shifts that results in the lowest reconstruction loss. Experiments on four benchmark dynamical systems, three with simulation data and one with the real-world data show that the LTC-NN architecture is more accurate in recovering implicit physics model coefficients than the state-of-the-art sparse model recovery approaches. We also introduce four additional case studies (total eight) on real-life medical examples in simulation and with real-world clinical data to show effectiveness of our approach in recovering underlying model in practice.

Recovering implicit physics model under real-world constraints

TL;DR

This paper tackles the problem of recovering underlying physics from real-world dynamical data where sampling is sub-Nyquist, measurements are incomplete, and external human inputs introduce timing and magnitude uncertainties. It introduces LTC-NN-MR, a neural-architecture extension that uses a dense layer and ODE-solver–based loss to infer sparse, implicit model coefficients while handling perturbations and input-timing errors through input-shift search. The approach addresses five real-world constraints (C1–C5) and demonstrates superior accuracy in recovering model coefficients and reconstructions across multiple simulation and real-world benchmarks, including AID and EEG datasets. The results suggest LTC-NN-MR provides a robust, scalable pathway for safe, real-time digital twins and human-in-the-loop control, with attention to practical ethics in deployment.

Abstract

Recovering a physics-driven model, i.e. a governing set of equations of the underlying dynamical systems, from the real-world data has been of recent interest. Most existing methods either operate on simulation data with unrealistically high sampling rates or require explicit measurements of all system variables, which is not amenable in real-world deployments. Moreover, they assume the timestamps of external perturbations to the physical system are known a priori, without uncertainty, implicitly discounting any sensor time-synchronization or human reporting errors. In this paper, we propose a novel liquid time constant neural network (LTC-NN) based architecture to recover underlying model of physical dynamics from real-world data. The automatic differentiation property of LTC-NN nodes overcomes problems associated with low sampling rates, the input dependent time constant in the forward pass of the hidden layer of LTC-NN nodes creates a massive search space of implicit physical dynamics, the physics model solver based data reconstruction loss guides the search for the correct set of implicit dynamics, and the use of the dropout regularization in the dense layer ensures extraction of the sparsest model. Further, to account for the perturbation timing error, we utilize dense layer nodes to search through input shifts that results in the lowest reconstruction loss. Experiments on four benchmark dynamical systems, three with simulation data and one with the real-world data show that the LTC-NN architecture is more accurate in recovering implicit physics model coefficients than the state-of-the-art sparse model recovery approaches. We also introduce four additional case studies (total eight) on real-life medical examples in simulation and with real-world clinical data to show effectiveness of our approach in recovering underlying model in practice.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 25 sections, 12 equations, 4 figures, 8 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Liquid Time Constant neural network based architecture for model recovery.
  • Figure 2: Implementation of neural architecture based model recovery solution with input uncertainty.
  • Figure 3: Comparison of SINDYc with neural architecture for configuration $\Phi_N$ by only varying sampling frequency to Nyquist rate, no implicit dynamics, with perturbation, and no input uncertainty.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of SINDYc with neural architecture for configuration $\Phi_{NI}$ by sampling at Nyquist rate, no implicit dynamics, with/ without perturbation, and no input uncertainty.

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Remark 1
  • Remark 2