Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Background-dependent and classical correspondences between $f(Q)$ and $f(T)$ gravity

Cheng Wu, Xin Ren, Yuhang Yang, Yu-Min Hu, Emmanuel N. Saridakis

TL;DR

The paper analyzes background-dependent relationships between $f(Q)$ non-metricity gravity and $f(T)$ teleparallel gravity, highlighting two main correspondences: Minkowski-equivalence (ME) that maps certain flat-space solutions between the theories via a tetrad-spin formulation of $f(Q)$, and an equations-of-motion (EoMs) correspondence that aligns their field equations under symmetry. By developing the covariant $f(Q)$ framework and the tetrad-spin description of $f(T)$, the authors classify connection branches in cosmological and black-hole spacetimes, identifying when ME and EoMs correspondences hold or fail. They show that in cosmology, $f(T)$ solutions form a subset of $f(Q)$ solutions under EoMs, while in black-hole backgrounds the subset relation breaks due to the complex $f(T)$ branch, which lacks a $f(Q)$ counterpart. Overall, the work clarifies how different geometric formulations and symmetry constraints influence the interrelation of these modified gravity theories and lays groundwork for broader comparisons within General Teleparallel Gravity.

Abstract

$f(Q)$ and $f(T)$ gravity are based on fundamentally different geometric frameworks, yet they exhibit many similar properties. This article provides a comprehensive summary and comparative analysis of the various theoretical branches of torsional gravity and non-metric gravity, which arise from different choices of affine connection. We identify two types of background-dependent and classical correspondences between these two theories of gravity. The first correspondence is established through their equivalence within the Minkowski spacetime background. To achieve this, we develop the tetrad-spin formulation of $f(Q)$ gravity and derive the corresponding expression for the spin connection. The second correspondence is based on the equivalence of their equations of motion. Utilizing a metric-affine approach, we derive the general affine connection for static and spherically symmetric spacetime in $f(Q)$ gravity and compare its equations of motion with those of $f(T)$ gravity. Among others, our results reveal that, $f(T)$ solutions are not simply a subset of $f(Q)$ solutions; rather, they encompass a complex solution beyond $f(Q)$ gravity in black hole background.

Background-dependent and classical correspondences between $f(Q)$ and $f(T)$ gravity

TL;DR

The paper analyzes background-dependent relationships between non-metricity gravity and teleparallel gravity, highlighting two main correspondences: Minkowski-equivalence (ME) that maps certain flat-space solutions between the theories via a tetrad-spin formulation of , and an equations-of-motion (EoMs) correspondence that aligns their field equations under symmetry. By developing the covariant framework and the tetrad-spin description of , the authors classify connection branches in cosmological and black-hole spacetimes, identifying when ME and EoMs correspondences hold or fail. They show that in cosmology, solutions form a subset of solutions under EoMs, while in black-hole backgrounds the subset relation breaks due to the complex branch, which lacks a counterpart. Overall, the work clarifies how different geometric formulations and symmetry constraints influence the interrelation of these modified gravity theories and lays groundwork for broader comparisons within General Teleparallel Gravity.

Abstract

and gravity are based on fundamentally different geometric frameworks, yet they exhibit many similar properties. This article provides a comprehensive summary and comparative analysis of the various theoretical branches of torsional gravity and non-metric gravity, which arise from different choices of affine connection. We identify two types of background-dependent and classical correspondences between these two theories of gravity. The first correspondence is established through their equivalence within the Minkowski spacetime background. To achieve this, we develop the tetrad-spin formulation of gravity and derive the corresponding expression for the spin connection. The second correspondence is based on the equivalence of their equations of motion. Utilizing a metric-affine approach, we derive the general affine connection for static and spherically symmetric spacetime in gravity and compare its equations of motion with those of gravity. Among others, our results reveal that, solutions are not simply a subset of solutions; rather, they encompass a complex solution beyond gravity in black hole background.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 25 sections, 116 equations, 3 tables.