Improving Pre-trained Self-Supervised Embeddings Through Effective Entropy Maximization
Deep Chakraborty, Yann LeCun, Tim G. J. Rudner, Erik Learned-Miller
TL;DR
This work tackles the challenge of squeezing additional performance from already-pretrained self-supervised embeddings by maximizing entropy through a practically estimable, low-dimensional criterion. The proposed E2MC objective adds an entropy term based on 1D marginals and a covariance penalty to standard SSL losses, with embeddings mapped to compact spaces via sigmoid or Gaussian-based transforms to ensure meaningful entropy estimates. Empirical results on ImageNet and transfer datasets show that a handful of continued pre-training epochs with E2MC yields consistent, sometimes substantial, improvements across VICReg, SwAV, and, to a lesser extent, SimSiam, while ablations highlight the necessity of both entropy and covariance components. The approach is computationally efficient, does not require high-dimensional joint-entropy estimation, and offers a practical path to enhance downstream performance in resource-constrained settings, with potential applicability to larger transformer-based models in the future.
Abstract
A number of different architectures and loss functions have been applied to the problem of self-supervised learning (SSL), with the goal of developing embeddings that provide the best possible pre-training for as-yet-unknown, lightly supervised downstream tasks. One of these SSL criteria is to maximize the entropy of a set of embeddings in some compact space. But the goal of maximizing the embedding entropy often depends -- whether explicitly or implicitly -- upon high dimensional entropy estimates, which typically perform poorly in more than a few dimensions. In this paper, we motivate an effective entropy maximization criterion (E2MC), defined in terms of easy-to-estimate, low-dimensional constraints. We demonstrate that using it to continue training an already-trained SSL model for only a handful of epochs leads to a consistent and, in some cases, significant improvement in downstream performance. We perform careful ablation studies to show that the improved performance is due to the proposed add-on criterion. We also show that continued pre-training with alternative criteria does not lead to notable improvements, and in some cases, even degrades performance.
