Table of Contents
Fetching ...

First-order definitions of rings of integral functions over algebraic extensions of function fields and undecidability

Alexandra Shlapentokh, Caleb Springer

TL;DR

The paper investigates how definability and decidability questions behave for infinite algebraic extensions ${\bf K}$ of ${\mathbb F}_p(t)$ by introducing the local notion of $q$-boundedness and exploiting norm equations via the Hasse Norm Principle. It proves that for globally $q$-bounded Galois extensions, the integral closure ${\mathcal O}_{\bf K}$ of ${\mathbb F}_p[u]$ inside ${\bf K}$ is first-order definable for infinitely many non-constant $u$, and that with an infinite constant field the theories of ${\bf K}$ and ${\mathcal O}_{\bf K}$ are undecidable while ${\mathbb F}_p[w]$ is definable for every non-constant $w$. The work develops a robust framework linking norm equations, local–global principles, and Diophantine definitions to define valuation rings and rings of ${\mathcal S}$-integers in infinite extensions, and it obtains strong undecidability results under various hypotheses, including connections to recent preprints. A key contribution is a systematic method to obtain existential or first-order definability of valuation rings and ${\mathcal S}$-integers in $q$-bounded extensions, complemented by results on the definability of arbitrary polynomial rings once a single polynomial ring is definable. Taken together, these results illuminate the landscape between decidability/undecidability in function-field-like settings and provide tools for explicit definability in infinite extensions.

Abstract

In this paper, we study questions of definability and decidability for infinite algebraic extensions ${\bf K}$ of $\mathbb{F}_p(t)$ and their subrings of $\mathcal{S}$-integral functions. We focus on fields ${\bf K}$ satisfying a local property which we call $q$-boundedness. This can be considered a function field analogue of prior work of the first author which considered algebraic extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$. One simple consequence of our work states that if ${\bf K}$ is a $q$-bounded Galois extension of $\mathbb{F}_p(t)$, then for infinitely many non-constant $u$ the integral closure $\mathcal{O}_{\bf K}$ of $\mathbb{F}_p[u]$ inside ${\bf K}$ is first-order definable in ${\bf K}$. Under the additional assumption that the constant subfield of ${\bf K}$ is infinite, it follows that both $\mathcal{O}_{\bf K}$ and ${\bf K}$ have undecidable first-order theories, and that $\mathbb{F}_p[w]$ is definable in ${\bf K}$ for every non-constant $w$ in ${\bf K}$. Our primary tools are norm equations and the Hasse Norm Principle, in the spirit of Rumely. Our paper has an intersection with a recent arXiv preprint by Martínez-Ranero, Salcedo, and Utreras, although our definability results are more extensive and undecidability results are much stronger.

First-order definitions of rings of integral functions over algebraic extensions of function fields and undecidability

TL;DR

The paper investigates how definability and decidability questions behave for infinite algebraic extensions of by introducing the local notion of -boundedness and exploiting norm equations via the Hasse Norm Principle. It proves that for globally -bounded Galois extensions, the integral closure of inside is first-order definable for infinitely many non-constant , and that with an infinite constant field the theories of and are undecidable while is definable for every non-constant . The work develops a robust framework linking norm equations, local–global principles, and Diophantine definitions to define valuation rings and rings of -integers in infinite extensions, and it obtains strong undecidability results under various hypotheses, including connections to recent preprints. A key contribution is a systematic method to obtain existential or first-order definability of valuation rings and -integers in -bounded extensions, complemented by results on the definability of arbitrary polynomial rings once a single polynomial ring is definable. Taken together, these results illuminate the landscape between decidability/undecidability in function-field-like settings and provide tools for explicit definability in infinite extensions.

Abstract

In this paper, we study questions of definability and decidability for infinite algebraic extensions of and their subrings of -integral functions. We focus on fields satisfying a local property which we call -boundedness. This can be considered a function field analogue of prior work of the first author which considered algebraic extensions of . One simple consequence of our work states that if is a -bounded Galois extension of , then for infinitely many non-constant the integral closure of inside is first-order definable in . Under the additional assumption that the constant subfield of is infinite, it follows that both and have undecidable first-order theories, and that is definable in for every non-constant in . Our primary tools are norm equations and the Hasse Norm Principle, in the spirit of Rumely. Our paper has an intersection with a recent arXiv preprint by Martínez-Ranero, Salcedo, and Utreras, although our definability results are more extensive and undecidability results are much stronger.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 24 sections, 12 theorems, 62 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.3

The integral closure ${\mathcal{O}}_{\bf K}$ of ${\mathbb F}_p[t]$ in ${\bf K}$ is first-order definable over ${\bf K}$.

Theorems & Definitions (59)

  • Theorem 1.3: Corollary \ref{['cor:S-ints_def']}
  • Theorem 1.4: Corollaries \ref{['cor:dec_field_infinite_constants_general']} and \ref{['cor:any_poly_ring_q_bounded']}
  • Theorem 1.5: Theorems \ref{['thm:val_ring_ex_def']}-\ref{['thm:val_ring_first_order_def']}
  • Theorem 2.1: Martinez-Ranero, Salcedo and Utreras, Theorem 5.1
  • Theorem 2.2: Martinez-Ranero, Salcedo and Utreras, Theorem 4.1
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • Theorem 4.1: Hasse Norm Principle, §9, Tate65
  • proof
  • ...and 49 more