Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Generalized Finite Difference Method for Solving Stochastic Diffusion Equations

Faezeh Nassajian Mojarrad

Abstract

Stochastic diffusion equations are crucial for modeling a range of physical phenomena influenced by uncertainties. We introduce the generalized finite difference method for solving these equations. Then, we examine its consistency, stability and convergence in mean-square, showing that the proposed method preserves stability and demonstrates favorable convergence characteristics under suitable assumptions. In order to validate the methodology, we present numerical results in one-, two-, and three-dimensional space domains.

Generalized Finite Difference Method for Solving Stochastic Diffusion Equations

Abstract

Stochastic diffusion equations are crucial for modeling a range of physical phenomena influenced by uncertainties. We introduce the generalized finite difference method for solving these equations. Then, we examine its consistency, stability and convergence in mean-square, showing that the proposed method preserves stability and demonstrates favorable convergence characteristics under suitable assumptions. In order to validate the methodology, we present numerical results in one-, two-, and three-dimensional space domains.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 3 theorems, 42 equations, 8 figures, 4 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1

The scheme defined in eq:scheme is consistent in mean square for eq:main.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Central node with its star.
  • Figure 2: One dimension grid of nodes.
  • Figure 3: Plot of the mean solution and the analytical solution for the stochastic diffusion equation in one dimension.
  • Figure 4: Plot of the mean solution for the stochastic diffusion equation for one dimension with $\rho=0.01$ and $\mu=0.1$.
  • Figure 5: Irregular clouds of points.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Definition 1
  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Definition 2
  • Theorem 2
  • proof
  • Definition 3
  • Theorem 3
  • proof