Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Sensor-fusion based Prognostics for Deep-space Habitats Exhibiting Multiple Unlabeled Failure Modes

Benjamin Peters, Ayush Mohanty, Xiaolei Fang, Nagi Gebraeel, Stephen K. Robinson

TL;DR

The paper tackles prognostics for deep-space habitats where failure modes are unlabeled and sensor relevance is mode-dependent. It introduces a two-phase approach: offline clustering and sensor selection using CA-FPCA and an EM-based regression with MGR-ASGL, and online diagnosis via MFPCA with a weighted, time-varying functional regression to predict $\ln{TTF}$ and thus RUL. The method yields interpretable sensor selections and improved RUL accuracy on both simulated data and real-world-like C-MAPSS data, outperforming several baselines especially for shorter remaining life. This work enables autonomous, interpretable prognostics in long-duration missions where ground support is unavailable, with potential extensions to nonlinear models to capture complex degradation trends.

Abstract

Deep-space habitats are complex systems that must operate autonomously over extended durations without ground-based maintenance. These systems are vulnerable to multiple, often unknown, failure modes that affect different subsystems and sensors in mode-specific ways. Developing accurate remaining useful life (RUL) prognostics is challenging, especially when failure labels are unavailable and sensor relevance varies by failure mode. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised prognostics framework that jointly identifies latent failure modes and selects informative sensors using only unlabeled training data. The methodology consists of two phases. In the offline phase, we model system failure times using a mixture of Gaussian regressions and apply an Expectation-Maximization algorithm to cluster degradation trajectories and select mode-specific sensors. In the online phase, we extract low-dimensional features from the selected sensors to diagnose the active failure mode and predict RUL using a weighted regression model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on a simulated dataset that reflects deep-space telemetry characteristics and on a real-world engine degradation dataset, showing improved accuracy and interpretability over existing methods.

Sensor-fusion based Prognostics for Deep-space Habitats Exhibiting Multiple Unlabeled Failure Modes

TL;DR

The paper tackles prognostics for deep-space habitats where failure modes are unlabeled and sensor relevance is mode-dependent. It introduces a two-phase approach: offline clustering and sensor selection using CA-FPCA and an EM-based regression with MGR-ASGL, and online diagnosis via MFPCA with a weighted, time-varying functional regression to predict and thus RUL. The method yields interpretable sensor selections and improved RUL accuracy on both simulated data and real-world-like C-MAPSS data, outperforming several baselines especially for shorter remaining life. This work enables autonomous, interpretable prognostics in long-duration missions where ground support is unavailable, with potential extensions to nonlinear models to capture complex degradation trends.

Abstract

Deep-space habitats are complex systems that must operate autonomously over extended durations without ground-based maintenance. These systems are vulnerable to multiple, often unknown, failure modes that affect different subsystems and sensors in mode-specific ways. Developing accurate remaining useful life (RUL) prognostics is challenging, especially when failure labels are unavailable and sensor relevance varies by failure mode. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised prognostics framework that jointly identifies latent failure modes and selects informative sensors using only unlabeled training data. The methodology consists of two phases. In the offline phase, we model system failure times using a mixture of Gaussian regressions and apply an Expectation-Maximization algorithm to cluster degradation trajectories and select mode-specific sensors. In the online phase, we extract low-dimensional features from the selected sensors to diagnose the active failure mode and predict RUL using a weighted regression model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on a simulated dataset that reflects deep-space telemetry characteristics and on a real-world engine degradation dataset, showing improved accuracy and interpretability over existing methods.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 1 theorem, 19 equations, 6 figures, 5 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 1

The expectation of the CDLL w.r.t distribution $g$ is a lower bound for the IDLL i.e.,

Figures (6)

  • Figure 3: Case study 1 data: Signals in sensors 1, 3, 5, 19 (columns 1, 2, 3, 4 respectively) for FM 1 and 2 under different SNRs -- [2, 5], [5, 8], and [8, 11] (rows 1, 2, 3 respectively)
  • Figure 4: Prediction error (in $\%$) for all test systems of case study 1 under three different SNRs i.e., [2, 5], [5, 8], and [8, 11]
  • Figure 5: The system diagram used in Case Study 2 adapted from Saxena2008
  • Figure 6: Raw sensor data used for offline step in case study 2. The data is inherently unlabeled i.e., failure modes are not known.
  • Figure 7: Average Prediction error ($\%$) in case study 2 with comparison to Wu2023, and Chehade2018
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Lemma 1
  • proof