Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024

M. Ishak, J. Pan, R. Calderon, K. Lodha, G. Valogiannis, A. Aviles, G. Niz, L. Yi, C. Zheng, C. Garcia-Quintero, A. de Mattia, L. Medina-Varela, J. L. Cervantes-Cota, U. Andrade, D. Huterer, H. E. Noriega, G. Zhao, A. Shafieloo, W. Fang, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, E. Burtin, E. Chaussidon, T. Claybaugh, S. Cole, A. de la Macorra, Arjun Dey, K. Fanning, S. Ferraro, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gaztañaga, H. Gil-Marín, S. Gontcho A Gontcho, G. Gutierrez, C. Hahn, K. Honscheid, C. Howlett, S. Juneau, D. Kirkby, T. Kisner, A. Kremin, M. Landriau, L. Le Guillou, A. Leauthaud, M. E. Levi, A. Meisner, R. Miquel, J. Moustakas, J. A. Newman, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, W. J. Percival, C. Poppett, F. Prada, I. Pérez-Ràfols, A. J. Ross, G. Rossi, E. Sanchez, D. Schlegel, M. Schubnell, H. Seo, D. Sprayberry, G. Tarlé, M. Vargas-Magana, B. A. Weaver, R. H. Wechsler, C. Yèche, P. Zarrouk, R. Zhou, H. Zou

TL;DR

This work tests General Relativity on cosmological scales by analyzing DESI DR1 full-shape clustering in combination with Planck CMB, DES Y3, SN, and BBN data. It adopts multiple MG parameterizations, including time- and scale-dependent $\mu(a,k)$, $\Sigma(a,k)$, and $\eta(a,k)$, as well as EFT/α-basis Horndeski frameworks, to quantify deviations from GR in both $\Lambda$CDM and $w_0w_a$CDM backgrounds. Across functional and redshift-redshift+scale binning parameterizations, all MG parameters are consistent with GR, with the tightest constraints achieved when DESI is combined with CMB (LoLLiPoP/HiLLiPoP) and DESY3/DESSNY5 SN data; notably, the Planck lensing tension in $\Sigma_0$ is mitigated with newer likelihoods. The analysis also finds a persistent indication of dynamical dark energy in the $w_0w_a$CDM background, while EFT/α-basis constraints remain broadly GR-compatible, with mild hints for nonzero braiding. Overall, DESI one-year data demonstrate competitive MG constraints, and future DESI data are expected to significantly improve sensitivity to gravity theories on cosmological scales.

Abstract

We present cosmological constraints on deviations from general relativity (GR) from the first-year of clustering observations from Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) in combination with other datasets. We first consider $μ(a,k)$-$Σ(a,k)$ modified gravity (MG) parametrization (as well as $η(a,k)$) in flat $Λ$CDM and $w_0 w_a$CDM backgrounds. Using a functional form for time-only evolution gives $μ_0=0.11^{+0.44}_{-0.54}$ from DESI(FS+BAO)+BBN and a wide prior on $n_{s}$. Using DESI(FS+BAO)+CMB+DESY3+DESY5-SN, we obtain $μ_0=0.05\pm 0.22$ and $Σ_0=0.008\pm 0.045$ in the $Λ$CDM background. In $w_0 w_a$CDM, we obtain $μ_0=-0.24^{+0.32}_{-0.28}$ and $Σ_0=0.006\pm 0.043$, consistent with GR, and still find a preference for dynamical dark energy with $w_0>-1$ and $w_a<0$. We then use binned forms in the 2 backgrounds starting with 2 bins in redshift and then adding 2 bins in scale for a total of 4 and 8 MG parameters, respectively. All MG parameters are found consistent with GR. We also find that the tension reported for $Σ_0$ with GR from Planck PR3 goes away when using LoLLiPoP+HiLLiPoP likelihoods. As noted previously, this seems to indicate the tension is related to CMB lensing anomaly in PR3 which is also resolved when using these likelihoods. We then constrain the class of Horndeski theory in both EFT-basis and $α$-basis. Assuming a power law for the non-minimal coupling function $Ω$, we obtain $Ω_0=0.012^{+0.001}_{-0.012}$ and $s_0=0.996^{+0.54}_{-0.20}$ from DESI(FS+BAO)+DESY5SN+CMB in a $Λ$CDM background, consistent with GR. Using the $α$-basis with no-braiding ($α_B=0$) gives $c_M<1.14$, in agreement with GR. However, we see a mild yet consistent indication for $c_B>0$ when $α_B$ is varied which will require further study to determine whether this is due to systematics or new physics. [Abridged]

Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024

TL;DR

This work tests General Relativity on cosmological scales by analyzing DESI DR1 full-shape clustering in combination with Planck CMB, DES Y3, SN, and BBN data. It adopts multiple MG parameterizations, including time- and scale-dependent , , and , as well as EFT/α-basis Horndeski frameworks, to quantify deviations from GR in both CDM and CDM backgrounds. Across functional and redshift-redshift+scale binning parameterizations, all MG parameters are consistent with GR, with the tightest constraints achieved when DESI is combined with CMB (LoLLiPoP/HiLLiPoP) and DESY3/DESSNY5 SN data; notably, the Planck lensing tension in is mitigated with newer likelihoods. The analysis also finds a persistent indication of dynamical dark energy in the CDM background, while EFT/α-basis constraints remain broadly GR-compatible, with mild hints for nonzero braiding. Overall, DESI one-year data demonstrate competitive MG constraints, and future DESI data are expected to significantly improve sensitivity to gravity theories on cosmological scales.

Abstract

We present cosmological constraints on deviations from general relativity (GR) from the first-year of clustering observations from Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) in combination with other datasets. We first consider - modified gravity (MG) parametrization (as well as ) in flat CDM and CDM backgrounds. Using a functional form for time-only evolution gives from DESI(FS+BAO)+BBN and a wide prior on . Using DESI(FS+BAO)+CMB+DESY3+DESY5-SN, we obtain and in the CDM background. In CDM, we obtain and , consistent with GR, and still find a preference for dynamical dark energy with and . We then use binned forms in the 2 backgrounds starting with 2 bins in redshift and then adding 2 bins in scale for a total of 4 and 8 MG parameters, respectively. All MG parameters are found consistent with GR. We also find that the tension reported for with GR from Planck PR3 goes away when using LoLLiPoP+HiLLiPoP likelihoods. As noted previously, this seems to indicate the tension is related to CMB lensing anomaly in PR3 which is also resolved when using these likelihoods. We then constrain the class of Horndeski theory in both EFT-basis and -basis. Assuming a power law for the non-minimal coupling function , we obtain and from DESI(FS+BAO)+DESY5SN+CMB in a CDM background, consistent with GR. Using the -basis with no-braiding () gives , in agreement with GR. However, we see a mild yet consistent indication for when is varied which will require further study to determine whether this is due to systematics or new physics. [Abridged]

Paper Structure

This paper contains 26 sections, 41 equations, 14 figures, 9 tables.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: MG parameterization $\mu$--$\Sigma$ with time-dependence only. 68% and 95% credible-interval contours in a $\Lambda$CDM background cosmology plus scalar perturbations to GR. Top-Left: DESI in the horizontal band and CMB no-lensing for the 3 different likelihoods. Top-Right: Similar constraints but adding CMB Lensing data. Bottom-Left: DESI combined with CMB no-lensing for the three likelihoods. Bottom-Right: Similar constraints as on bottom left, but adding CMB Lensing data. See section \ref{['sec:functional_a_dependence']} for discussion. We note that the shaded area on the top left of figures shows the hard prior $\mu_0 < 2 \Sigma_0 + 1$ that is added due to a numerical computational limitation of MG software codes based on CAMB CMB code. As we explain in \ref{['sec:functional']}, this prior does not affect our main results from combinations of datasets.
  • Figure 2: MG parameterization of $\mu$--$\Sigma$ with time-dependence only. Marginalized means and 68% credible intervals on $\mu_0$ and $\Sigma_0$ in a $\Lambda$CDM background cosmology plus scalar perturbations to GR. Note that DESI alone does not constrain $\Sigma_0$.
  • Figure 3: MG parameterization of $\mu$--$\eta$ with time-dependence only. 68% and 95% credible intervals in a $\Lambda$CDM background cosmology plus scalar perturbations to GR. Left: CMB constraints with and without lensing for the two likelihoods PR3 and LoLLiPoP-HiLLiPoP for Planck data. Right: DESI (FS+ BAO) + CMB combinations using the same two likelihoods, respectively.
  • Figure 4: Left: MG parameterization of $\mu$--$\Sigma$ with time-dependence only. 68% and 95% credible intervals in a $\Lambda \rm CDM$ background cosmology plus scalar perturbations to GR for the datasets indicated. Right: MG Functional parameterization for $\mu$--$\eta$ with time-dependence only. 68% and 95% credible intervals in a $\Lambda \rm CDM$ background cosmology plus scalar perturbations to GR for the datasets indicated. See section \ref{['sec:functional_a_dependence']} for discussion for both panels.
  • Figure 5: Left: MG Functional parameterization for $\mu$--$\Sigma$ with time-dependence only. 68% and 95% credible intervals in a $w_0w_a$CDM background cosmology plus scalar perturbations to GR for the dataset indicated. Right: 68% and 95% credible intervals for the dark energy equation of state parameters $(w_0,w_a)$. See section \ref{['sec:functional_a_dependence']} for discussion for both panels.
  • ...and 9 more figures