Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Reorienting quandle orbits

Lorenzo Traldi

TL;DR

The paper analyzes the orientation-reversal of a quandle orbit, a concept motivated by knot theory, and formalizes it as $Q^{\mathrm{rev}}(x)$ obtained by inverting $\beta_y$ for $y$ in the orbit $Q_x$. It introduces the notion $Q^{\mathrm{rev}}(x)_{\mathcal{V}}$ to test whether a quandle variety $\mathcal{V}$ preserves enough information to recover the original quandle, defining a variety as suited if this holds for all $Q$. The main result demonstrates that the medial-quandle variety $\mathcal{M}$ is not suited by constructing an infinite medial quandle $Q$ with two orbits for which $Q^{\mathrm{rev}}(0_2)_{\mathcal{M}}$ collapses to a two-element trivial quandle, showing that reversal plus a quotient can lose essential structure. This indicates limitations of naive orientation-reversals in medial settings and motivates developing orientation notions compatible with quandle-variety structure.

Abstract

Motivated by knot theory, it is natural to define the orientation-reversal of a quandle orbit by inverting all the translations given by elements of that orbit. In this short note we observe that this natural notion is unsuited to medial quandles.

Reorienting quandle orbits

TL;DR

The paper analyzes the orientation-reversal of a quandle orbit, a concept motivated by knot theory, and formalizes it as obtained by inverting for in the orbit . It introduces the notion to test whether a quandle variety preserves enough information to recover the original quandle, defining a variety as suited if this holds for all . The main result demonstrates that the medial-quandle variety is not suited by constructing an infinite medial quandle with two orbits for which collapses to a two-element trivial quandle, showing that reversal plus a quotient can lose essential structure. This indicates limitations of naive orientation-reversals in medial settings and motivates developing orientation notions compatible with quandle-variety structure.

Abstract

Motivated by knot theory, it is natural to define the orientation-reversal of a quandle orbit by inverting all the translations given by elements of that orbit. In this short note we observe that this natural notion is unsuited to medial quandles.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 3 theorems, 8 equations, 1 figure.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. An example

Key Result

Lemma 3

Every element of $N$ is $x=n_1t+n_2t^2+J$ for some unique $n_1,n_2 \in \mathbb Z$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The underpassing arc $b$ is on the right of $a$, and $b \triangleright a$ is on the left.

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Lemma 3
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • Theorem 5
  • proof