Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Agentic LLMs in the Supply Chain: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Consensus-Seeking

Valeria Jannelli, Stefan Schoepf, Matthias Bickel, Torbjørn Netland, Alexandra Brintrup

TL;DR

This paper explores how Large Language Models can automate consensus-seeking in supply chain management (SCM), where frequent decisions on problems such as inventory levels and delivery times require coordination among companies and introduces a series of novel, supply chain-specific consensus-seeking frameworks tailored for LLM agents.

Abstract

This paper explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can automate consensus-seeking in supply chain management (SCM), where frequent decisions on problems such as inventory levels and delivery times require coordination among companies. Traditional SCM relies on human consensus in decision-making to avoid emergent problems like the bullwhip effect. Some routine consensus processes, especially those that are time-intensive and costly, can be automated. Existing solutions for automated coordination have faced challenges due to high entry barriers locking out SMEs, limited capabilities, and limited adaptability in complex scenarios. However, recent advances in Generative AI, particularly LLMs, show promise in overcoming these barriers. LLMs, trained on vast datasets can negotiate, reason, and plan, facilitating near-human-level consensus at scale with minimal entry barriers. In this work, we identify key limitations in existing approaches and propose autonomous LLM agents to address these gaps. We introduce a series of novel, supply chain-specific consensus-seeking frameworks tailored for LLM agents and validate the effectiveness of our approach through a case study in inventory management. To accelerate progress within the SCM community, we open-source our code, providing a foundation for further advancements in LLM-powered autonomous supply chain solutions.

Agentic LLMs in the Supply Chain: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Consensus-Seeking

TL;DR

This paper explores how Large Language Models can automate consensus-seeking in supply chain management (SCM), where frequent decisions on problems such as inventory levels and delivery times require coordination among companies and introduces a series of novel, supply chain-specific consensus-seeking frameworks tailored for LLM agents.

Abstract

This paper explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can automate consensus-seeking in supply chain management (SCM), where frequent decisions on problems such as inventory levels and delivery times require coordination among companies. Traditional SCM relies on human consensus in decision-making to avoid emergent problems like the bullwhip effect. Some routine consensus processes, especially those that are time-intensive and costly, can be automated. Existing solutions for automated coordination have faced challenges due to high entry barriers locking out SMEs, limited capabilities, and limited adaptability in complex scenarios. However, recent advances in Generative AI, particularly LLMs, show promise in overcoming these barriers. LLMs, trained on vast datasets can negotiate, reason, and plan, facilitating near-human-level consensus at scale with minimal entry barriers. In this work, we identify key limitations in existing approaches and propose autonomous LLM agents to address these gaps. We introduce a series of novel, supply chain-specific consensus-seeking frameworks tailored for LLM agents and validate the effectiveness of our approach through a case study in inventory management. To accelerate progress within the SCM community, we open-source our code, providing a foundation for further advancements in LLM-powered autonomous supply chain solutions.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 39 sections, 2 equations, 14 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: Complex consensus-seeking tasks are out of scope for current autonomous agents. LLM agents promise a new frontier, enabling complex consensus finding at scale beyond human speeds and thus unlocking significant efficiency improvements.
  • Figure 2: Problem setting: sequential supply chain with partial observability.
  • Figure 3: LLM-powered consensus-seeking frameworks for the sequential supply chain
  • Figure 4: Standalone LLM-powered decision-making process. Alt Text: Flowchart of a standalone LLM-powered decision making process.
  • Figure 5: Detailed modular framework for 3-tier supply chain with communication between neighbours.
  • ...and 9 more figures