Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Modified Dirichlet character sums over the $k$-free integers

Caio Bueno

Abstract

The main question of this paper is the following: how much cancellation can the partial sums restricted to the $k$-free integers up to $x$ of a $\pm 1$ multiplicative function $f$ be in terms of $x$? Building upon the recent paper by Q. Liu, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 39 (2023), no. 12, 2316-2328, we prove that under the Riemann Hypothesis for quadratic Dirichlet $L$-functions, we can get $x^{1/(k+1)}$ cancellation when $f$ is a modified quadratic Dirichlet character, i.e., $f$ is completely multiplicative and for some quadratic Dirichlet character $χ$, $f(p)=χ(p)$ for all but a finite subset of prime numbers. This improves the conditional results by Aymone, Medeiros and the author cf. Ramanujan J. 59 (2022), no. 3, 713-728.

Modified Dirichlet character sums over the $k$-free integers

Abstract

The main question of this paper is the following: how much cancellation can the partial sums restricted to the -free integers up to of a multiplicative function be in terms of ? Building upon the recent paper by Q. Liu, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 39 (2023), no. 12, 2316-2328, we prove that under the Riemann Hypothesis for quadratic Dirichlet -functions, we can get cancellation when is a modified quadratic Dirichlet character, i.e., is completely multiplicative and for some quadratic Dirichlet character , for all but a finite subset of prime numbers. This improves the conditional results by Aymone, Medeiros and the author cf. Ramanujan J. 59 (2022), no. 3, 713-728.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 7 theorems, 73 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Assume the Generalized Riemann hypothesis. There exists a multiplicative function $f:\mathbb{N}\to\{-1,0,+1\}$ with support on the $k$-free integers such that, at prime numbers, $f$ takes values in $\{-1,+1\}$ and we have

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Remark 1
  • Conjecture 1.1: Aymone Aymone-edp-cubefree
  • Remark 2
  • Remark 3
  • Lemma 4.1: Montgomery-Vaughan, Theorem 5.1 and Corollary 5.3, pp. 138-140
  • Lemma 4.2
  • Lemma 4.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 4.4
  • ...and 7 more