Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Prediction of Acoustic Communication Performance for AUVs using Gaussian Process Classification

Yifei Gao, Harun Yetkin, McMahon James, Daniel J. Stilwell

TL;DR

A novel approach that involves learning a map representing the probability of successful communication based on the locations of the transmitting and receiving vehicles, and investigates the application of Gaussian process binary classification to generate the desired communication map.

Abstract

Cooperating autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) often rely on acoustic communication to coordinate their actions effectively. However, the reliability of underwater acoustic communication decreases as the communication range between vehicles increases. Consequently, teams of cooperating AUVs typically make conservative assumptions about the maximum range at which they can communicate reliably. To address this limitation, we propose a novel approach that involves learning a map representing the probability of successful communication based on the locations of the transmitting and receiving vehicles. This probabilistic communication map accounts for factors such as the range between vehicles, environmental noise, and multi-path effects at a given location. In pursuit of this goal, we investigate the application of Gaussian process binary classification to generate the desired communication map. We specialize existing results to this specific binary classification problem and explore methods to incorporate uncertainty in vehicle location into the mapping process. Furthermore, we compare the prediction performance of the probability communication map generated using binary classification with that of a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) communication map generated using Gaussian process regression. Our approach is experimentally validated using communication and navigation data collected during trials with a pair of Virginia Tech 690 AUVs.

Prediction of Acoustic Communication Performance for AUVs using Gaussian Process Classification

TL;DR

A novel approach that involves learning a map representing the probability of successful communication based on the locations of the transmitting and receiving vehicles, and investigates the application of Gaussian process binary classification to generate the desired communication map.

Abstract

Cooperating autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) often rely on acoustic communication to coordinate their actions effectively. However, the reliability of underwater acoustic communication decreases as the communication range between vehicles increases. Consequently, teams of cooperating AUVs typically make conservative assumptions about the maximum range at which they can communicate reliably. To address this limitation, we propose a novel approach that involves learning a map representing the probability of successful communication based on the locations of the transmitting and receiving vehicles. This probabilistic communication map accounts for factors such as the range between vehicles, environmental noise, and multi-path effects at a given location. In pursuit of this goal, we investigate the application of Gaussian process binary classification to generate the desired communication map. We specialize existing results to this specific binary classification problem and explore methods to incorporate uncertainty in vehicle location into the mapping process. Furthermore, we compare the prediction performance of the probability communication map generated using binary classification with that of a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) communication map generated using Gaussian process regression. Our approach is experimentally validated using communication and navigation data collected during trials with a pair of Virginia Tech 690 AUVs.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 23 equations, 5 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Virginia Tech 690 AUVs
  • Figure 2: Successful (top) and unsuccessful(bottom) ground truth validation points
  • Figure 3: Predicted mean SNR(dB) and variance on successful (top row) and unsuccessful (bottom row) validation points using GPR
  • Figure 4: Predicted probability and latent variance on successful (top row) and unsuccessful (bottom row) validation points using SVGPC
  • Figure 5: Prediction of mean and probability on fixed region using GPR and SVGPC