Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A necessary and sufficient condition for $k$-transversals

Daniel McGinnis, Nikola Sadovek

TL;DR

Problem: characterize when a finite family $\mathcal{F}$ of convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ admits a $k$-transversal for all $0 \le k \le d-1$. The authors introduce the linear-algebraic notion of $\mathbb{F}$-dependency consistency with $(d-k)$-tuples in a finite set $P \subseteq \mathbb{F}^k$ and prove a necessary-and-sufficient condition that exactly characterizes the existence of a $k$-transversal, including a complex analogue for $\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{C}$. The proof uses a configuration-space/test-map scheme and a Borsuk-Ulam-type theorem on Stiefel manifolds, unifying Helly's theorem ($k=0$) and the Goodman–Pollack–Wenger theorem ($k=d-1$) and yielding complex-central transversal results. Consequently, central transversal theorems of Živaljević–Vrećica and Dol'nikov (real) and Sadovek–Soberón (complex) follow as corollaries. The work provides a topological framework for geometric transversal theory and suggests avenues for colorful generalizations and further extensions.

Abstract

We solve a long-standing open problem posed by Goodman \& Pollack in 1988 by establishing a necessary and sufficient condition for a family of convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ to admit a $k$-transversal for any $0 \le k \le d-1$. This result is a common generalization of Helly's theorem ($k=0$) and the Goodman-Pollack-Wenger theorem ($k=d-1$). Additionally, we obtain an analogue in the complex setting by characterizing the existence of a complex $k$-transversal to a family of convex sets in $\mathbb{C}^d$, extending the work of McGinnis ($k=d-1$). Our approach is topological and employs a Borsuk-Ulam-type theorem on Stiefel manifolds. Finally, we demonstrate how our results imply the central transversal theorems of Živaljević-Vrećica and Dol'nikov in the real case and of Sadovek-Soberón in the complex case.

A necessary and sufficient condition for $k$-transversals

TL;DR

Problem: characterize when a finite family of convex sets in admits a -transversal for all . The authors introduce the linear-algebraic notion of -dependency consistency with -tuples in a finite set and prove a necessary-and-sufficient condition that exactly characterizes the existence of a -transversal, including a complex analogue for . The proof uses a configuration-space/test-map scheme and a Borsuk-Ulam-type theorem on Stiefel manifolds, unifying Helly's theorem () and the Goodman–Pollack–Wenger theorem () and yielding complex-central transversal results. Consequently, central transversal theorems of Živaljević–Vrećica and Dol'nikov (real) and Sadovek–Soberón (complex) follow as corollaries. The work provides a topological framework for geometric transversal theory and suggests avenues for colorful generalizations and further extensions.

Abstract

We solve a long-standing open problem posed by Goodman \& Pollack in 1988 by establishing a necessary and sufficient condition for a family of convex sets in to admit a -transversal for any . This result is a common generalization of Helly's theorem () and the Goodman-Pollack-Wenger theorem (). Additionally, we obtain an analogue in the complex setting by characterizing the existence of a complex -transversal to a family of convex sets in , extending the work of McGinnis (). Our approach is topological and employs a Borsuk-Ulam-type theorem on Stiefel manifolds. Finally, we demonstrate how our results imply the central transversal theorems of Živaljević-Vrećica and Dol'nikov in the real case and of Sadovek-Soberón in the complex case.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 11 theorems, 27 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

A finite family of pairwise disjoint convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^2$ has a $1$-transversal if and only if the sets in the family can be linearly ordered such that any three sets have a $1$-transversal consistent with the ordering.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Implication of geometric transversal theorems.
  • Figure 2: The point $\mathop{\mathrm{\mathrm{proj}}}\nolimits_{{U}}(q_F)$ lies above the dashed line $(p_{{{U}},F})^{\perp_\mathbb{R}}\!+\!p_{{{U}},F}$.

Theorems & Definitions (19)

  • Theorem 1.1: Hadwiger HadwigerLines
  • Definition 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: Goodman-Pollack-Wenger PollackNecessary1990
  • Proposition 2.3: mcginnis2023necessary
  • Definition 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5: mcginnis2023complex
  • Definition 3.1
  • ...and 9 more