Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A System Parametrization for Direct Data-Driven Analysis and Control with Error-in-Variables

Felix Brändle, Frank Allgöwer

TL;DR

This work addresses direct data-driven analysis and control for systems with error-in-variables by deriving an explicit linear fractional transformation (LFT) parametrization of all data-consistent systems using the Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury formula. It then formulate a single, data-length–independent semidefinite program (SDP) to compute a guaranteed upper bound on the unknown true system’s $\,\mathcal{H}_2$-norm, leveraging robust control techniques and a data-dependent feasibility condition via a right inverse $G$. The main contributions are the exact parametrization $\\Sigma_{\\Theta}^G$, the SDP-based $\,\mathcal{H}_2$ analysis, and the modular framework that accommodates controller synthesis and various noise models. The results demonstrate practical viability and show how the approach scales with data length and choice of $G$, providing reliable guarantees for direct data-driven analysis and control under measurement disturbances.

Abstract

In this paper, we present a new parametrization to perform direct data-driven analysis and controller synthesis for the error-in-variables case. To achieve this, we employ the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formula to transform the problem into a linear fractional transformation (LFT) with unknown measurement errors and disturbances as uncertainties. For bounded uncertainties, we apply robust control techniques to derive a guaranteed upper bound on the H2-norm of the unknown true system. To this end, a single semidefinite program (SDP) needs to be solved, with complexity that is independent of the amount of data. Furthermore, we exploit the signal-to-noise ratio to provide a data-dependent condition, that characterizes whether the proposed parametrization can be employed. The modular formulation allows to extend this framework to controller synthesis with different performance criteria, input-output settings, and various system properties. Finally, we validate the proposed approach through a numerical example.

A System Parametrization for Direct Data-Driven Analysis and Control with Error-in-Variables

TL;DR

This work addresses direct data-driven analysis and control for systems with error-in-variables by deriving an explicit linear fractional transformation (LFT) parametrization of all data-consistent systems using the Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury formula. It then formulate a single, data-length–independent semidefinite program (SDP) to compute a guaranteed upper bound on the unknown true system’s -norm, leveraging robust control techniques and a data-dependent feasibility condition via a right inverse . The main contributions are the exact parametrization , the SDP-based analysis, and the modular framework that accommodates controller synthesis and various noise models. The results demonstrate practical viability and show how the approach scales with data length and choice of , providing reliable guarantees for direct data-driven analysis and control under measurement disturbances.

Abstract

In this paper, we present a new parametrization to perform direct data-driven analysis and controller synthesis for the error-in-variables case. To achieve this, we employ the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formula to transform the problem into a linear fractional transformation (LFT) with unknown measurement errors and disturbances as uncertainties. For bounded uncertainties, we apply robust control techniques to derive a guaranteed upper bound on the H2-norm of the unknown true system. To this end, a single semidefinite program (SDP) needs to be solved, with complexity that is independent of the amount of data. Furthermore, we exploit the signal-to-noise ratio to provide a data-dependent condition, that characterizes whether the proposed parametrization can be employed. The modular formulation allows to extend this framework to controller synthesis with different performance criteria, input-output settings, and various system properties. Finally, we validate the proposed approach through a numerical example.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 40 equations, 1 figure.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Error ratio of the robust $\mathcal{H}_2$-norm and the ratio of feasible SDP in Theorem \ref{['theorem:Analysis:RobustH2']}, depending on the data length $N$, averaged over $1000$ experiments for different right inverses.

Theorems & Definitions (3)

  • proof
  • proof
  • proof