Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Phantom Edges in the Problem Hamiltonian: A Method for Increasing Performance and Graph Visibility for QAOA

Quinn Langfitt, Reuben Tate, Stephan Eidenbenz

TL;DR

Phantom-QAOA addresses the locality limitation of QAOA at finite depth by introducing a single tunable weight $\alpha$ on phantom edges in the phase operator, effectively expanding the graph seen by the algorithm. The authors derive a general $p=1$ Max-Cut expectation and prove analytical improvements on even-length cycles, supported by numerical gains on random regular graphs up to 16 nodes for $p=1$ and $p=2$. They propose two edge-placement strategies for the augmented graph, with the triangle-based approach yielding more robust gains while controlling circuit depth. The work demonstrates meaningful improvements in approximation ratios and outlines future directions for richer edge-weight schemes, alternative augmentations of $G'$, and hardware-aware optimization trade-offs.

Abstract

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a variational quantum algorithm that can be used to approximately solve combinatorial optimization problems. However, a major limitation of QAOA is that it is a "local" algorithm for finite circuit depths, meaning it can only optimize over local properties of the graph. In this paper, we present Phantom-QAOA, a new QAOA ansatz that introduces only one additional parameter to the standard ansatz -- regardless of system size -- allowing QAOA to "see" more of the graph at a given depth $p$. We achieve this by modifying the target graph to include additional $α$-weighted edges, with $α$ serving as a tunable parameter. This modified graph is then used to construct the phase operator and allows QAOA to explore a wider range of the graph's features. We derive a general formula for our new ansatz at $p=1$ and analytically show an improvement in the approximation ratio for cycle graphs. We also provide numerical experiments that demonstrate significant improvements in the approximation ratio for the Max-Cut problem over the standard QAOA ansatz for $p=1$ and $p=2$ on random regular graphs up to 16 nodes.

Phantom Edges in the Problem Hamiltonian: A Method for Increasing Performance and Graph Visibility for QAOA

TL;DR

Phantom-QAOA addresses the locality limitation of QAOA at finite depth by introducing a single tunable weight on phantom edges in the phase operator, effectively expanding the graph seen by the algorithm. The authors derive a general Max-Cut expectation and prove analytical improvements on even-length cycles, supported by numerical gains on random regular graphs up to 16 nodes for and . They propose two edge-placement strategies for the augmented graph, with the triangle-based approach yielding more robust gains while controlling circuit depth. The work demonstrates meaningful improvements in approximation ratios and outlines future directions for richer edge-weight schemes, alternative augmentations of , and hardware-aware optimization trade-offs.

Abstract

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a variational quantum algorithm that can be used to approximately solve combinatorial optimization problems. However, a major limitation of QAOA is that it is a "local" algorithm for finite circuit depths, meaning it can only optimize over local properties of the graph. In this paper, we present Phantom-QAOA, a new QAOA ansatz that introduces only one additional parameter to the standard ansatz -- regardless of system size -- allowing QAOA to "see" more of the graph at a given depth . We achieve this by modifying the target graph to include additional -weighted edges, with serving as a tunable parameter. This modified graph is then used to construct the phase operator and allows QAOA to explore a wider range of the graph's features. We derive a general formula for our new ansatz at and analytically show an improvement in the approximation ratio for cycle graphs. We also provide numerical experiments that demonstrate significant improvements in the approximation ratio for the Max-Cut problem over the standard QAOA ansatz for and on random regular graphs up to 16 nodes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 3 theorems, 33 equations, 6 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Consider the QAOA$_1$ state $|\gamma, \beta\rangle$ for Max-Cut on a graph $G$.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Visualization of graph $G'$, where the black lines are the edges from the original graph $G$ and additional $\alpha$-weighted edges are denoted by red lines. For the edge $(xy)$, $d = 2$ and $d' = 1$ denote two existing and one phantom neighbor of $x$, respectively. Similarly, for vertex $y$, $e = 1$ and $e' = 2$. The triangles formed around this edge include: one with vertex $u$ ($f = 1$), one with vertex $w$ ($f' = 1$), and another with vertex $v$ ($f" = 1$).
  • Figure 2: Examples of 8-vertex cycle graphs $G$ shown in black and additional $\alpha$-weighted edges shown in red. The left image shows a $G'$ that is regular and triangle-free, while the right image shows a $G'$ that is also regular but contains triangles.
  • Figure 3: The average approximation ratios on 16-node graphs with degrees 4, 8, and 12 across various QAOA ansatzes: the standard ansatz at p=1 and p=2 (denoted 'p=1' and 'p=2') and the Phantom-QAOA ansatz (denoted 'p=1 Phantom' and 'p=2 Phantom'). Here we used the Triangle method for Phantom-QAOA.
  • Figure 4: Average improvement in approximation ratio vs degree for nodes 8-16: (a) p=1 Full method, (b) p=1 Triangle method, (c) p=2 Full method, (d) p=2 Triangle method
  • Figure 5: Average optimal $\alpha$ for (a) Full method at $p=1$, (b) Triangle method at $p=1$, (c) Full method at $p=2$, and (d) Triangle method at $p=2$.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • proof
  • Corollary 1: Triangle-Free Case