Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Gluing methods for quantitative stability of optimal transport maps

Cyril Letrouit, Quentin Mérigot

TL;DR

This paper develops a quantitative theory for the stability of the quadratic optimal transport map $T_\mu$ with a fixed source density $\rho$ when the target $\mu$ varies. By recasting stability as a variance inequality for Brenier potentials and employing two complementary domain-decomposition strategies (Whitney/Boman chain in John domains and a graph-based spectral method for tail densities), the authors prove that the map $\mu\mapsto T_\mu$ is bi-Hölder with dimension-free exponents and that the linearized metric $W_{2,\rho}(\mu,\nu)$ is bi-Hölder equivalent to $W_2(\mu,\nu)$. They establish concrete stability bounds across several regimes: log-concave sources, John domains, degenerating densities near boundaries, generalized Cauchy densities, and others; they also provide a counterexample showing potential instability in non-John domains and prove sharp exponents in the tail-density setting. The results broaden the applicability of linearized OT embeddings and furnish explicit, geometry-aware stability estimates with practical implications for numerical OT and distributional-data analysis.

Abstract

We establish quantitative stability bounds for the quadratic optimal transport map $T_μ$ between a fixed probability density $ρ$ and a probability measure $μ$ on $\mathbb{R}^d$. Under general assumptions on $ρ$, we prove that the map $μ\mapsto T_μ$ is bi-Hölder continuous, with dimension-free Hölder exponents. The linearized optimal transport metric $W_{2,ρ}(μ,ν)=\|T_μ-T_ν\|_{L^2(ρ)}$ is therefore bi-Hölder equivalent to the $2$-Wasserstein distance, which justifies its use in applications. We show this property in the following cases: (i) for any log-concave density $ρ$ with full support in $\mathbb{R}^d$, and any log-bounded perturbation thereof; (ii) for $ρ$ bounded away from $0$ and $+\infty$ on a John domain (e.g., on a bounded Lipschitz domain), while the only previously known result of this type assumed convexity of the domain; (iii) for some important families of probability densities on bounded domains which decay or blow-up polynomially near the boundary. Concerning the sharpness of point (ii), we also provide examples of non-John domains for which the Brenier potentials do not satisfy any Hölder stability estimate. Our proofs rely on local variance inequalities for the Brenier potentials in small convex subsets of the support of $ρ$, which are glued together to deduce a global variance inequality. This gluing argument is based on two different strategies of independent interest: one of them leverages the properties of the Whitney decomposition in bounded domains, the other one relies on spectral graph theory.

Gluing methods for quantitative stability of optimal transport maps

TL;DR

This paper develops a quantitative theory for the stability of the quadratic optimal transport map with a fixed source density when the target varies. By recasting stability as a variance inequality for Brenier potentials and employing two complementary domain-decomposition strategies (Whitney/Boman chain in John domains and a graph-based spectral method for tail densities), the authors prove that the map is bi-Hölder with dimension-free exponents and that the linearized metric is bi-Hölder equivalent to . They establish concrete stability bounds across several regimes: log-concave sources, John domains, degenerating densities near boundaries, generalized Cauchy densities, and others; they also provide a counterexample showing potential instability in non-John domains and prove sharp exponents in the tail-density setting. The results broaden the applicability of linearized OT embeddings and furnish explicit, geometry-aware stability estimates with practical implications for numerical OT and distributional-data analysis.

Abstract

We establish quantitative stability bounds for the quadratic optimal transport map between a fixed probability density and a probability measure on . Under general assumptions on , we prove that the map is bi-Hölder continuous, with dimension-free Hölder exponents. The linearized optimal transport metric is therefore bi-Hölder equivalent to the -Wasserstein distance, which justifies its use in applications. We show this property in the following cases: (i) for any log-concave density with full support in , and any log-bounded perturbation thereof; (ii) for bounded away from and on a John domain (e.g., on a bounded Lipschitz domain), while the only previously known result of this type assumed convexity of the domain; (iii) for some important families of probability densities on bounded domains which decay or blow-up polynomially near the boundary. Concerning the sharpness of point (ii), we also provide examples of non-John domains for which the Brenier potentials do not satisfy any Hölder stability estimate. Our proofs rely on local variance inequalities for the Brenier potentials in small convex subsets of the support of , which are glued together to deduce a global variance inequality. This gluing argument is based on two different strategies of independent interest: one of them leverages the properties of the Whitney decomposition in bounded domains, the other one relies on spectral graph theory.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 36 sections, 22 theorems, 186 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Let $\mathcal{X}\subset\mathbb{R}^d$ be a compact convex set and $\rho$ be a probability density on $\mathcal{X}$, bounded from above and below by positive constants. Let $p>d$ and $p\geq 4$. Assume that $\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ have bounded $p$-th moment, i.e. $\max(\int_{\mathbb{R}^ If $\mu,\nu$ are supported on a compact set $\mathcal{Y}$, the Hölder exponent for the Brenier map

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Room and passage domain
  • Figure 2: The decomposition of $\mathbb{R}^d$ for $d=2$. Four domains $Q_{(J,\sigma)}$ are drawn: in blue, in green, with a grid and with crosshatches.
  • Figure 3: The graph $G_r$ for $r=2^3$ and $d=2$. Only a few labels are written.

Theorems & Definitions (56)

  • Definition 1.1: Potentials and maps
  • Theorem 1.2: Introduction of delmer
  • Remark 1.3: Comparison between $W_1$ and $W_2$
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Definition 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Definition 1.8
  • Theorem 1.9
  • Theorem 1.10
  • ...and 46 more