Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On endomorphism algebras of string almost gentle algebras

Yu-Zhe Liu, Panyue Zhou

Abstract

For any arbitrary string almost gentle algebra, we consider specific subsets of its quiver's arrow set, denoted by $\mathcal{R}$. For each such $\mathcal{R}$, we introduce the finitely generated module $M_{\mathcal{R}}$ and define its associated $\mathcal{R}$-endomorphism algebra $A_{\mathcal{R}}$. In this paper, we show that the representation type of a string gentle algebra $A$, the representation type of the $\mathcal{R}$-endomorphism algebra $A_{\mathcal{R}}$ for some $\mathcal{R}$, the representation types of all $\mathcal{R}$-algebras, and the representation type of the Cohen-Macaulay Auslander algebra $A^{\mathrm{CMA}}$ of $A$ are equivalent. The results presented here reveal a deep structural connection between different classes of algebras derived from string gentle algebras. By showing the equivalence of representation types, this work offers new insights into the nature of endomorphism algebras and Cohen-Macaulay Auslander algebras, contributing to a broader understanding of their algebraic properties and classification.

On endomorphism algebras of string almost gentle algebras

Abstract

For any arbitrary string almost gentle algebra, we consider specific subsets of its quiver's arrow set, denoted by . For each such , we introduce the finitely generated module and define its associated -endomorphism algebra . In this paper, we show that the representation type of a string gentle algebra , the representation type of the -endomorphism algebra for some , the representation types of all -algebras, and the representation type of the Cohen-Macaulay Auslander algebra of are equivalent. The results presented here reveal a deep structural connection between different classes of algebras derived from string gentle algebras. By showing the equivalence of representation types, this work offers new insights into the nature of endomorphism algebras and Cohen-Macaulay Auslander algebras, contributing to a broader understanding of their algebraic properties and classification.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 19 theorems, 23 equations, 8 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

There exists at least one subset $\mathcal{R}$ of $\mathcal{Q}_1$ (note that the module $\alpha A$ with $\alpha \in \mathcal{R}$ may not be Gorenstein projective; see Example examp:SAG ) such that the following statements hold:

Figures (8)

  • Figure 2.1: The bound quiver of the string algebra given in Example \ref{['examp:string']}
  • Figure 3.1: The strings respectively corresponding to $P(v)$ and $P(w)$
  • Figure 3.2: If $g$ can be decomposed through $P(u)$ ($\not\cong P(w)$)
  • Figure 3.3: If $f$ can be decomposed through $\beta A$ ($\not\cong \alpha A$)
  • Figure 4.1: The bound quiver $(\mathcal{R}(\mathcal{Q}),\mathcal{R}(\mathcal{I}))$ of $\mathcal{R}(A)$
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (43)

  • Theorem 1.2: Theorem \ref{['thm:main 1']}
  • Theorem 1.3: Theorem \ref{['thm:main 4']}
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Definition 2.1
  • Example 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Theorem 2.6: Butler-Ringel BR1987
  • Theorem 2.7
  • ...and 33 more