Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum LDPC Codes of Almost Linear Distance via Homological Products

Louis Golowich, Venkatesan Guruswami

TL;DR

The key insight here is that by using subsystem codes (but still with constant-weight stabilizers), this work can circumvent a particular obstruction that limited the distance of many prior product code constructions to at most $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N})$.

Abstract

We present new constructions of quantum codes of linear or close-to-linear distance and dimension with low-weight stabilizers. Only a few constructions of such codes were previously known, and were primarily based on a specific operation from homological algebra, namely the balanced product. In contrast, our constructions are based on a more basic and widely used product, namely the homological product (i.e. the tensor product of chain complexes). Our results help address the natural question: When do homological products preserve good code distance? Our first main result constructs asymptotically good $[[N,Θ(N),Θ(N)]]$ quantum codes with small polynomial stabilizer weight from homological products of codes with a property called product-expansion. This notion was recently introduced and used to bound the distance of balanced product quantum codes; we apply it instead to homological products. For every $ε>0$, our second main result constructs close-to-linear distance $[[N,N^{1-ε},N^{1-ε}]]$ (subsystem) quantum LDPC codes with constant stabilizer weight from iterated homological products of a constant-sized quantum locally testable code. The key insight here is that by using subsystem codes (but still with constant-weight stabilizers), we can circumvent a particular obstruction that limited the distance of many prior product code constructions to at most $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N})$.

Quantum LDPC Codes of Almost Linear Distance via Homological Products

TL;DR

The key insight here is that by using subsystem codes (but still with constant-weight stabilizers), this work can circumvent a particular obstruction that limited the distance of many prior product code constructions to at most .

Abstract

We present new constructions of quantum codes of linear or close-to-linear distance and dimension with low-weight stabilizers. Only a few constructions of such codes were previously known, and were primarily based on a specific operation from homological algebra, namely the balanced product. In contrast, our constructions are based on a more basic and widely used product, namely the homological product (i.e. the tensor product of chain complexes). Our results help address the natural question: When do homological products preserve good code distance? Our first main result constructs asymptotically good quantum codes with small polynomial stabilizer weight from homological products of codes with a property called product-expansion. This notion was recently introduced and used to bound the distance of balanced product quantum codes; we apply it instead to homological products. For every , our second main result constructs close-to-linear distance (subsystem) quantum LDPC codes with constant stabilizer weight from iterated homological products of a constant-sized quantum locally testable code. The key insight here is that by using subsystem codes (but still with constant-weight stabilizers), we can circumvent a particular obstruction that limited the distance of many prior product code constructions to at most .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 29 sections, 32 theorems, 144 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $Q^1,\dots,Q^t$ consist of either: Then the homological product of $Q^1,\dots,Q^t$ gives an asymptotically goodRecall that an $[[N,K,D]]_q$ code is a quantum code on qudits of local dimension $q$ with block length $N$, dimension (i.e. number of logical qudits) $K$, and distance $D$. The code is said to be asymptotically good if $K,D=

Theorems & Definitions (79)

  • Theorem 1.1: Informal statement of Theorem \ref{['thm:peprodinf']}
  • Theorem 1.2: Informal statement of Theorem \ref{['thm:iterativeinf']}
  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: Informal statement of Corollary \ref{['cor:ssperandom']} Corollary \ref{['cor:sspeRS']}, Corollary \ref{['cor:sspemanyrandom']}
  • Definition 2.3: kalachev_two-sided_2023
  • Theorem 2.4: Informal statement of Theorem \ref{['thm:sspe']} with Proposition \ref{['prop:sskunneth']}
  • proof : Proof of distance bound in $t=2$ case of Theorem \ref{['thm:sspeinf']}
  • Definition 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • Remark 2.7
  • ...and 69 more