Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the optimality of the HOD dichotomy

Gabriel Goldberg, Jonathan Osinski, Alejandro Poveda

Abstract

In the first part of the manuscript, we establish several consistency results concerning Woodin's $\HOD$ hypothesis and large cardinals around the level of extendibility. First, we prove that the first extendible cardinal can be the first strongly compact in HOD. We extend a former result of Woodin by showing that under the HOD hypothesis the first extendible cardinal is $C^{(1)}$-supercompact in HOD. We also show that the first cardinal-correct extendible may not be extendible, thus answering a question by Gitman and Osinski \cite[\S9]{GitOsi}. In the second part of the manuscript, we discuss the extent to which weak covering can fail below the first supercompact cardinal $δ$ in a context where the HOD hypothesis holds. Answering a question of Cummings et al. \cite{CumFriGol}, we show that under the $\HOD$ hypothesis there are many singulars $κ<δ$ where $\cf^{\HOD}(κ)=\cf(κ)$ and $κ^{+\HOD}=κ^{+}.$ In contrast, we also show that the $\HOD$ hypothesis is consistent with $δ$ carrying a club of $\HOD$-regulars cardinals $κ$ such that $κ^{+\HOD}<κ^{+}$. Finally, we close the manuscript with a discussion about the $\HOD$ hypothesis and $ω$-strong measurability.

On the optimality of the HOD dichotomy

Abstract

In the first part of the manuscript, we establish several consistency results concerning Woodin's hypothesis and large cardinals around the level of extendibility. First, we prove that the first extendible cardinal can be the first strongly compact in HOD. We extend a former result of Woodin by showing that under the HOD hypothesis the first extendible cardinal is -supercompact in HOD. We also show that the first cardinal-correct extendible may not be extendible, thus answering a question by Gitman and Osinski \cite[\S9]{GitOsi}. In the second part of the manuscript, we discuss the extent to which weak covering can fail below the first supercompact cardinal in a context where the HOD hypothesis holds. Answering a question of Cummings et al. \cite{CumFriGol}, we show that under the hypothesis there are many singulars where and In contrast, we also show that the hypothesis is consistent with carrying a club of -regulars cardinals such that . Finally, we close the manuscript with a discussion about the hypothesis and -strong measurability.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 26 theorems, 64 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

If $\delta$ is an extendible cardinal then exactly one of the following holds:

Theorems & Definitions (82)

  • Definition : midrasha
  • Theorem : HOD Dichotomy, midrasha
  • Definition 2.1: Bag
  • Definition 2.2: Bagaria Bag
  • Definition 2.3: Bagaria Bag
  • Theorem 2.4: Poveda, PovAxiomA
  • Theorem 2.5: Bagaria and Goldberg, BagGol
  • Definition 2.6: Woodin WooPartI
  • Theorem 2.7: WooPartI
  • Definition 2.8: Hamkins, HamCover
  • ...and 72 more