Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Towards a universal gateset for $\mathsf{QMA}_1$

Dorian Rudolph

TL;DR

It is proved that for all $k\in\mathbb N$, the gateset $G_{2^k}$ is universal for all gatesets in the cyclotomic field $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_{2^k}),\zeta_{2^k}=e^{2\pi i/2^k}$, and the Clique Homology problem without promise gap is PSPACE-complete.

Abstract

$\mathsf{QMA}_1$ is $\mathsf{QMA}$ with perfect completeness, i.e., the prover must accept with a probability of exactly $1$ in the YES-case. Whether $\mathsf{QMA}_1$ and $\mathsf{QMA}$ are equal is still a major open problem. It is not even known whether $\mathsf{QMA}_1$ has a universal gateset; Solovay-Kitaev does not apply due to perfect completeness. Hence, we do not generally know whether $\mathsf{QMA}_1^G=\mathsf{QMA}_1^{G'}$ (superscript denoting gateset), given two universal gatesets $G,G'$. In this paper, we make progress towards the gateset question by proving that for all $k\in\mathbb N$, the gateset $G_{2^k}$ (Amy et al., RC 2024) is universal for all gatesets in the cyclotomic field $\mathbb{Q}(ζ_{2^k}),ζ_{2^k}=e^{2πi/2^k}$, i.e. $\mathsf{QMA}_1^G\subseteq\mathsf{QMA}_1^{G_{2^k}}$ for all gatesets $G$ in $\mathbb{Q}(ζ_{2^k})$. For $\mathsf{BQP}_1$, we can even show that $G_2$ suffices for all $2^k$-th cyclotomic fields. We exhibit complete problems for all $\mathsf{QMA}_1^{G_{2^k}}$: Quantum $l$-SAT in $\mathbb{Q}(ζ_{2^k})$ is complete for $\mathsf{QMA}_1^{G_{2^k}}$ for all $l\ge4$, and $l=3$ if $k\ge3$, where quantum $l$-SAT is the problem of deciding whether a set of $l$-local Hamiltonians has a common ground state. Additionally, we give the first $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete $2$-local Hamiltonian problem: It is $\mathsf{QMA}_1^{G_{2^k}}$-complete (for $k\ge3$) to decide whether a given $2$-local Hamiltonian $H$ in $\mathbb{Q}(ζ_{2^k})$ has a nonempty nullspace. Our techniques also extend to sparse Hamiltonians, and so we can prove the first $\mathsf{QMA}_1(2)$-complete (i.e. $\mathsf{QMA}_1$ with two unentangled provers) Hamiltonian problem. Finally, we prove that the Gapped Clique Homology problem defined by King and Kohler (FOCS 2024) is $\mathsf{QMA}_1^{G_2}$-complete, and the Clique Homology problem without promise gap is PSPACE-complete.

Towards a universal gateset for $\mathsf{QMA}_1$

TL;DR

It is proved that for all , the gateset is universal for all gatesets in the cyclotomic field , and the Clique Homology problem without promise gap is PSPACE-complete.

Abstract

is with perfect completeness, i.e., the prover must accept with a probability of exactly in the YES-case. Whether and are equal is still a major open problem. It is not even known whether has a universal gateset; Solovay-Kitaev does not apply due to perfect completeness. Hence, we do not generally know whether (superscript denoting gateset), given two universal gatesets . In this paper, we make progress towards the gateset question by proving that for all , the gateset (Amy et al., RC 2024) is universal for all gatesets in the cyclotomic field , i.e. for all gatesets in . For , we can even show that suffices for all -th cyclotomic fields. We exhibit complete problems for all : Quantum -SAT in is complete for for all , and if , where quantum -SAT is the problem of deciding whether a set of -local Hamiltonians has a common ground state. Additionally, we give the first -complete -local Hamiltonian problem: It is -complete (for ) to decide whether a given -local Hamiltonian in has a nonempty nullspace. Our techniques also extend to sparse Hamiltonians, and so we can prove the first -complete (i.e. with two unentangled provers) Hamiltonian problem. Finally, we prove that the Gapped Clique Homology problem defined by King and Kohler (FOCS 2024) is -complete, and the Clique Homology problem without promise gap is PSPACE-complete.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 27 sections, 39 theorems, 64 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

theorem 1.1

For any finite gateset $\mathcal{G}\xspace$ in $\mathbb Q(\zeta_{2^k})$ with $k\in\mathbb N\xspace$, it holds that $\mathsf{QMA}\xspace_1\xspace^{\mathcal{G}\xspace} \subseteq \mathsf{QMA}\xspace_1\xspace^{\mathcal{G}\xspace_{2^k}}$. For any finite gateset $\mathcal{G}\xspace$ in $\mathbb Q(\mathrm{

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Graphical representation of the gadget $H_U$ defined in \ref{['eq:HU']}. Dashed edges indicate "conditional transitions", and the arrows indicate "unitary transitions" (which are of the form $\lambda I$ here), following the conventions of RGN24.
  • Figure 2: Graphical representation of the gadget $H_\mathsf{CX}\xspace$ defined in \ref{['eq:HCX']}.
  • Figure 3: Gadgets to implement $\mathcal{G}\xspace_2$ with $4-\mathsf{QSAT}\xspace\xspace$. Arrows indicate unitary transitions, and dashed edges conditional transitions. The qubits of the computational register are denoted $\mathcal{A}\xspace_1,\mathcal{A}\xspace_2,\mathcal{A}\xspace_3$.

Theorems & Definitions (79)

  • theorem 1.1: \ref{['thm:cyclotomic-gateset']}, \ref{['thm:qma-g2']}
  • theorem 1.2: \ref{['thm:bqp1']}
  • theorem 1.3: \ref{['thm:4SAT']}, \ref{['thm:3SAT']}, \ref{['thm:2LH-complete']}
  • theorem 1.4: \ref{['thm:qma(2)-g2']}, \ref{['thm:qma(2)-cyclotomic-gateset']}
  • theorem 1.5: \ref{['thm:QMA(2)']}, \ref{['thm:AESSH']}
  • theorem 1.6: \ref{['thm:GCH']}, \ref{['thm:CH']}
  • definition 2.1: $\mathsf{QMA}\xspace_1\xspace$
  • definition 2.2: $\mathsf{BQP}\xspace_1\xspace$
  • lemma 2.3
  • definition 2.5
  • ...and 69 more