Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Stability of spectral partitions with corners

Gregory Berkolaiko, Yaiza Canzani, Graham Cox, Peter Kuchment, Jeremy L. Marzuola

Abstract

A spectral minimal partition of a manifold is a decomposition into disjoint open sets that minimizes a spectral energy functional. While it is known that bipartite minimal partitions correspond to nodal partitions of Courant-sharp Laplacian eigenfunctions, the non-bipartite case is much more challenging. In this paper, we unify the bipartite and non-bipartite settings by defining a modified Laplacian operator and proving that the nodal partitions of its eigenfunctions are exactly the critical points of the spectral energy functional. Moreover, we prove that the Morse index of a critical point equals the nodal deficiency of the corresponding eigenfunction. Some striking consequences of our main result are: 1) in the bipartite case, every local minimum of the energy functional is in fact a global minimum; 2) in the non-bipartite case, every local minimum of the energy functional minimizes within a certain topological class of partitions. Our results are valid for partitions with non-smooth boundaries; this introduces considerable technical challenges, which are overcome using delicate approximation arguments in the Sobolev space $H^{1/2}$.

Stability of spectral partitions with corners

Abstract

A spectral minimal partition of a manifold is a decomposition into disjoint open sets that minimizes a spectral energy functional. While it is known that bipartite minimal partitions correspond to nodal partitions of Courant-sharp Laplacian eigenfunctions, the non-bipartite case is much more challenging. In this paper, we unify the bipartite and non-bipartite settings by defining a modified Laplacian operator and proving that the nodal partitions of its eigenfunctions are exactly the critical points of the spectral energy functional. Moreover, we prove that the Morse index of a critical point equals the nodal deficiency of the corresponding eigenfunction. Some striking consequences of our main result are: 1) in the bipartite case, every local minimum of the energy functional is in fact a global minimum; 2) in the non-bipartite case, every local minimum of the energy functional minimizes within a certain topological class of partitions. Our results are valid for partitions with non-smooth boundaries; this introduces considerable technical challenges, which are overcome using delicate approximation arguments in the Sobolev space .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 30 sections, 31 theorems, 137 equations, 10 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Let $P$ be a bipartite $k$-partition with corners. The following are equivalent:

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1.1: The so-called "Mercedes star" is conjectured to be the minimal 3-partition of the disk.
  • Figure 1.2: $P$, the partition of the square on the left, locally minimizes $\Lambda$. The partition on the right, $\tilde{P}$, is not included in this local comparison, as it is not of the form $\varphi(P)$ for any diffeomorphism $\varphi$ and hence is not close to $P$. Nonetheless, \ref{['thm:bi']} guarantees that $\Lambda(P) \leq \Lambda(\tilde{P})$.
  • Figure 3.1: Left: a 3-partition of the disk with a ball around each corner point. Right: a magnification showing a covering of part of $\partial M \cup\Sigma$, as in the proof of Lemma \ref{['lem:geo']}. The curve $\gamma$ (arising in step (3)) is shown in red, and the union of the blue and red curves is the set $\Gamma$, the smooth component of $\partial M \cup \Sigma$ that contains $\gamma$.
  • Figure 6.1: The slit disk $D \backslash \Gamma$ (left) and half disk $D_+$ (right) from \ref{['unfold']}.
  • Figure 8.1: The $(2,2)$ partition of the rectangle (left), a qualitative illustration of an energy decreasing deformation (center), and the conjectured topology of a locally minimal 4-partition (right).
  • ...and 5 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (63)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Remark 1.9
  • Theorem 1.10
  • ...and 53 more