Table of Contents
Fetching ...

10-list Recoloring of Planar Graphs

Daniel W. Cranston

TL;DR

This work proves that planar graphs with a fixed list assignment of size $|L(v)|=10$ admit $k$-good recolorings between any two colorings, with recolorings bounded linearly in the number of vertices. The authors introduce an Extension Lemma, a 'good subgraph' inductive framework, and a novel deferral/out-tree technique to certify reducible configurations without computer verification, enabling a linear bound on recolor length. A discharging argument with 36 reducible configurations (later refined to 520) eliminates the possibility of a minimal counterexample, confirming a conjecture by Dvorak and Feghali for planar graphs. The methods offer a potentially broad toolkit for tackling reconfiguration problems via local reducibility plus global discharging, and may extend to other coloring or correspondence-coloring settings.

Abstract

Fix a planar graph $G$ and a list-assignment $L$ with $|L(v)|=10$ for all $v\in V(G)$. Let $α$ and $β$ be $L$-colorings of $G$. A recoloring sequence from $α$ to $β$ is a sequence of $L$-colorings, beginning with $α$ and ending with $β$, such that each successive pair in the sequence differs in the color on a single vertex of $G$. We show that there exists a constant $C$ such that for all choices of $α$ and $β$ there exists a recoloring sequence $σ$ from $α$ to $β$ that recolors each vertex at most $C$ times. In particular, $σ$ has length at most $C|V(G)|$. This confirms a conjecture of Dvořák and Feghali. For our proof, we introduce a new technique for quickly showing that many configurations are reducible. We believe this method may be of independent interest and will have application to other problems in this area.

10-list Recoloring of Planar Graphs

TL;DR

This work proves that planar graphs with a fixed list assignment of size admit -good recolorings between any two colorings, with recolorings bounded linearly in the number of vertices. The authors introduce an Extension Lemma, a 'good subgraph' inductive framework, and a novel deferral/out-tree technique to certify reducible configurations without computer verification, enabling a linear bound on recolor length. A discharging argument with 36 reducible configurations (later refined to 520) eliminates the possibility of a minimal counterexample, confirming a conjecture by Dvorak and Feghali for planar graphs. The methods offer a potentially broad toolkit for tackling reconfiguration problems via local reducibility plus global discharging, and may extend to other coloring or correspondence-coloring settings.

Abstract

Fix a planar graph and a list-assignment with for all . Let and be -colorings of . A recoloring sequence from to is a sequence of -colorings, beginning with and ending with , such that each successive pair in the sequence differs in the color on a single vertex of . We show that there exists a constant such that for all choices of and there exists a recoloring sequence from to that recolors each vertex at most times. In particular, has length at most . This confirms a conjecture of Dvořák and Feghali. For our proof, we introduce a new technique for quickly showing that many configurations are reducible. We believe this method may be of independent interest and will have application to other problems in this area.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 17 theorems, 1 equation, 16 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Let $G$ be a graph, $L$ be a list assignment for $G$, and $\alpha$ and $\beta$ be $L$-colorings for $G$. Fix $v\in V(G)$. Let $G':=G-v$, and let $\alpha'$ and $\beta'$ be the restrictions to $G'$ of $\alpha$ and $\beta$. Suppose there exists a recoloring sequence $\sigma'$ that recolors $G$ from $\a

Figures (16)

  • Figure 1: Vertex degree as denoted by shape
  • Figure 2: This configuration appears in no $k$-minimal counterexample with $k\geqslant 828$.
  • Figure 3: The 4 configurations in the proof of Lemma \ref{['main-reduc-lem']}
  • Figure 4: \ref{['546671b-fig']} configurations shown reducible by Lemmas \ref{['first-reduc-lem']}, \ref{['second-reduc-lem']}, and \ref{['main-reduc-lem']}
  • Figure 6: 6 more reducible configurations
  • ...and 11 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (31)

  • Lemma 1: Extension Lemma
  • proof
  • Lemma 2: BP
  • proof
  • Conjecture 3
  • Proposition 5
  • proof
  • Remark 6
  • Lemma 7
  • Lemma 8
  • ...and 21 more