Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Adaptive Alignment: Dynamic Preference Adjustments via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Pluralistic AI

Hadassah Harland, Richard Dazeley, Peter Vamplew, Hashini Senaratne, Bahareh Nakisa, Francisco Cruz

TL;DR

The proposed framework for Multi Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL), via post-learning policy selection adjustment, is introduced, its anticipated advantages and assumptions are outlined, and technical details about the implementation are discussed.

Abstract

Emerging research in Pluralistic Artificial Intelligence (AI) alignment seeks to address how intelligent systems can be designed and deployed in accordance with diverse human needs and values. We contribute to this pursuit with a dynamic approach for aligning AI with diverse and shifting user preferences through Multi Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL), via post-learning policy selection adjustment. In this paper, we introduce the proposed framework for this approach, outline its anticipated advantages and assumptions, and discuss technical details about the implementation. We also examine the broader implications of adopting a retroactive alignment approach through the sociotechnical systems perspective.

Adaptive Alignment: Dynamic Preference Adjustments via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Pluralistic AI

TL;DR

The proposed framework for Multi Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL), via post-learning policy selection adjustment, is introduced, its anticipated advantages and assumptions are outlined, and technical details about the implementation are discussed.

Abstract

Emerging research in Pluralistic Artificial Intelligence (AI) alignment seeks to address how intelligent systems can be designed and deployed in accordance with diverse human needs and values. We contribute to this pursuit with a dynamic approach for aligning AI with diverse and shifting user preferences through Multi Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL), via post-learning policy selection adjustment. In this paper, we introduce the proposed framework for this approach, outline its anticipated advantages and assumptions, and discuss technical details about the implementation. We also examine the broader implications of adopting a retroactive alignment approach through the sociotechnical systems perspective.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 1 equation, 1 figure.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The self-review process leverages indirect feedback to adjust to the users' preferences.