Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Meissner state for type-II inhomogeneous superconductors

Matías Díaz-Vera, Carlos Román

Abstract

We consider extreme type-II superconductors modeled by the Ginzburg--Landau energy with a pinning term $a_\varepsilon(x)$, which we assume to be a bounded measurable function such that $b\leq a_\varepsilon(x)\leq 1$ for some constant $b>0$. A crucial feature of this type of superconductors is the occurrence of vortices, which appear above the so-called first critical field $H_{c_1}$. In this paper we estimate this value and characterize the behavior of the Meissner solution, the unique vortexless configuration that globally minimizes the energy below $H_{c_1}$. In addition, we show that beyond this value, for applied fields whose strength is slightly below the so-called superheating field $H_{sh}$, there exists a unique Meissner-type solution that locally minimizes the energy.

On the Meissner state for type-II inhomogeneous superconductors

Abstract

We consider extreme type-II superconductors modeled by the Ginzburg--Landau energy with a pinning term , which we assume to be a bounded measurable function such that for some constant . A crucial feature of this type of superconductors is the occurrence of vortices, which appear above the so-called first critical field . In this paper we estimate this value and characterize the behavior of the Meissner solution, the unique vortexless configuration that globally minimizes the energy below . In addition, we show that beyond this value, for applied fields whose strength is slightly below the so-called superheating field , there exists a unique Meissner-type solution that locally minimizes the energy.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 20 theorems, 94 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

Given any configuration $(\mathbf{u,A}) \in H^1(\Omega,\mathbb{C}) \times H^1(\Omega,\mathbb{R}^2)$, letting $(u,A)$ be defined through the relation $(\mathbf{u,A}) = \left(\rho_\varepsilon u, A + h_{\mathrm{ex}}A_\varepsilon^0\right)$, we have where

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Proposition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Remark 1.1
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Remark 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.1
  • ...and 39 more