Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The $s$-Energy and Its Applications

Bernard Chazelle, Kritkorn Karntikoon

TL;DR

This work introduces the $s$-energy as a scale-aware invariant to analyze time-varying averaging dynamics, establishing bounds that scale polynomially in the number of agents $n$ and exponentially in the maximum number of connected components $m$. By proving tight upper and lower bounds for general, reversible, expanding, and random averaging systems, the authors derive convergence guarantees for diverse models, including multi-flock bird dynamics, opinion formation with stubborn agents, and distributed coordination under failures. A key insight is that network connectivity governs the convergence rate, explaining the observed exponential gap between fixed and time-varying networks and enabling uniform convergence analyses across heterogeneous, adversarial, or non-reversible updates. The results offer a general-purpose framework for bounding convergence across dynamic networks and provide concrete algorithmic implications for distributed control and collective behavior.

Abstract

Many multi-agent systems evolve by repeatedly updating each state to a weighted average of its neighbors, a process known as averaging dynamics, whose behavior becomes difficult to analyze when the interaction network varies over time. In recent years, the $s$-energy has emerged as a useful tool for bounding the convergence rates of such systems, complementing the classical techniques that rely on fixed graphs. We derive new bounds on the $s$-energy under minimal connectivity assumptions. As a consequence, we obtain convergence guarantees for several models of collective dynamics and resolve a number of open questions in the areas. Our results highlight the dependence of the $s$-energy on the connectivity of the underlying networks and use it to explain the exponential gap in the convergence rates of stationary and time-varying consensus systems.

The $s$-Energy and Its Applications

TL;DR

This work introduces the -energy as a scale-aware invariant to analyze time-varying averaging dynamics, establishing bounds that scale polynomially in the number of agents and exponentially in the maximum number of connected components . By proving tight upper and lower bounds for general, reversible, expanding, and random averaging systems, the authors derive convergence guarantees for diverse models, including multi-flock bird dynamics, opinion formation with stubborn agents, and distributed coordination under failures. A key insight is that network connectivity governs the convergence rate, explaining the observed exponential gap between fixed and time-varying networks and enabling uniform convergence analyses across heterogeneous, adversarial, or non-reversible updates. The results offer a general-purpose framework for bounding convergence across dynamic networks and provide concrete algorithmic implications for distributed control and collective behavior.

Abstract

Many multi-agent systems evolve by repeatedly updating each state to a weighted average of its neighbors, a process known as averaging dynamics, whose behavior becomes difficult to analyze when the interaction network varies over time. In recent years, the -energy has emerged as a useful tool for bounding the convergence rates of such systems, complementing the classical techniques that rely on fixed graphs. We derive new bounds on the -energy under minimal connectivity assumptions. As a consequence, we obtain convergence guarantees for several models of collective dynamics and resolve a number of open questions in the areas. Our results highlight the dependence of the -energy on the connectivity of the underlying networks and use it to explain the exponential gap in the convergence rates of stationary and time-varying consensus systems.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 65 equations, 3 figures.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The graph $G_t$ is embedded on the real line (self-loops not shown) and $E_{s,t}= 3^s+4^s$.
  • Figure 2: A bird is influenced by its neighbors within distance $r$.
  • Figure 3: Simulation of a network of 900 robots in 3D with 60 of them (orange dots) pinned to a fixed plane $X=0$ and the rest (blue dots) are moving. The underlying network $G$ is a 30-by-30 grid graph, with edge failure probability equal to 0.3. The 60 nodes on two opposite sides of the grid are pinned to $X=0$.