Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On equivalence relations induced by locally compact TSI Polish groups admitting open identity component

Yang Zheng

Abstract

For a Polish group $G$, let $E(G)$ be the right coset equivalence relation $G^ω/c(G)$, where $c(G)$ is the group of all convergent sequences in $G$. We prove a Rigid theorem on locally compact TSI Polish groups admitting open identity component, as follows: Let $G$ be a locally compact TSI Polish group such that $G_0$ is open in $G$, and let $H$ be a nontrivial pro-Lie TSI Polish group. Then $E(G)\leq_BE(H)$ iff there exists a continuous homomorphism $φ:G_0\to H_0$ satisfying the following conditions: (i) $\ker(φ)$ is non-archimedean; (ii) $φ{\rm Inn}_G(G_0)\subseteq\overline{{\rm Inn}_H(H_0)φ}$ under pointwise convergence topology. An application of the Rigid theorem yields a negative answer to Question 7.5 of [2].

On equivalence relations induced by locally compact TSI Polish groups admitting open identity component

Abstract

For a Polish group , let be the right coset equivalence relation , where is the group of all convergent sequences in . We prove a Rigid theorem on locally compact TSI Polish groups admitting open identity component, as follows: Let be a locally compact TSI Polish group such that is open in , and let be a nontrivial pro-Lie TSI Polish group. Then iff there exists a continuous homomorphism satisfying the following conditions: (i) is non-archimedean; (ii) under pointwise convergence topology. An application of the Rigid theorem yields a negative answer to Question 7.5 of [2].

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 18 theorems, 92 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $G$ be a locally compact TSI Polish group such that $G_0$ is open in $G$, and let $H$ be a nontrivial pro-Lie TSI Polish group. Then $E(G)\leq_BE(H)$ iff there exists a continuous homomorphism $\phi:G_0\to H_0$ satisfying the following conditions:

Theorems & Definitions (35)

  • Theorem 1.1: Rigid theorem on locally compact TSI Polish groups admitting open identity component
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.1: DZtsi
  • ...and 25 more