Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Implicit-explicit time discretization schemes for a class of semilinear wave equations with nonautonomous dampings

Zhe Jiao, Yaxu Li, Lijing Zhao

Abstract

This paper is concerned about the implicit-explicit (IMEX) methods for a class of dissipative wave systems with time-varying velocity feedbacks and nonlinear potential energies, equipped with different boundary conditions. Firstly, we approximate the problems by using a vanilla IMEX method, which is a second-order scheme for the problems when the damping terms are time-independent. However, rigors analysis shows that the error rate declines from second to first order due to the nonautonomous dampings. To recover the convergence order, we propose a revised IMEX scheme and apply it to the nonautonomous wave equations with a kinetic boundary condition. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that the revised scheme can not only achieve second-order accuracy but also improve the computational efficiency.

Implicit-explicit time discretization schemes for a class of semilinear wave equations with nonautonomous dampings

Abstract

This paper is concerned about the implicit-explicit (IMEX) methods for a class of dissipative wave systems with time-varying velocity feedbacks and nonlinear potential energies, equipped with different boundary conditions. Firstly, we approximate the problems by using a vanilla IMEX method, which is a second-order scheme for the problems when the damping terms are time-independent. However, rigors analysis shows that the error rate declines from second to first order due to the nonautonomous dampings. To recover the convergence order, we propose a revised IMEX scheme and apply it to the nonautonomous wave equations with a kinetic boundary condition. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that the revised scheme can not only achieve second-order accuracy but also improve the computational efficiency.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 2 theorems, 100 equations, 7 figures, 3 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Let Assumptions $\mathrm{(H1)}$-$\mathrm{(H4)}$ be satisfied. Then for all $u^0\in V$, $v^0\in H$, eq:wave has a unique weak solution with $T = T(u^0, v^0)$. Moreover, if $u^0\in D(A)$, $v^0\in V$, there exists a strong solution to eq:wave

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Error $\mathcal{E}(0.8)$ of the full discretization \ref{['full_discretization']} plots for the problem with the damping coefficient $\gamma(t) = 0$. Left: coarse space discretization ($328193$ degrees of freedom, $h = 0.0139201$); Right: fine space discretization ($1311745$ degrees of freedom, $h = 0.00697294$).
  • Figure 2: Error $\mathcal{E}(0.8)$ of the full discretizations plots for the problem with the damping coefficient satisfying $r_1 =r_2 =1$ and $\eta = -2$.
  • Figure 3: Error $\mathcal{E}(0.8)$ of the full discretization plots for the problem with the damping coefficient satisfying $r_1 =r_2 = 1$ and $\eta = -1$.
  • Figure 4: Error $\mathcal{E}(0.8)$ of different time schemes with the same space discretization ($h = 0.0139201$) plotted against the runtime. Here, vIMEX: the vanilla IMEX scheme, rIMEX: the revised IMEX scheme, CN: the Crank--Nicolson scheme, and RK: the Runge--Kutta scheme.
  • Figure 5: The profiles of numerical solutions to the problem with the damping coefficient satisfying $r_1 =r_2 = 1$ and $\eta = -1$.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (3)

  • Lemma 2.1
  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof