Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The inexact power augmented Lagrangian method for constrained nonconvex optimization

Alexander Bodard, Konstantinos Oikonomidis, Emanuel Laude, Panagiotis Patrinos

TL;DR

This work introduces an inexact power augmented Lagrangian method for nonconvex problems with nonlinear equality constraints by using a power-type augmenting term φ(A(x))=(1/(ν+1))||A(x)||^{ν+1} with ν∈(0,1]. The authors develop an outer-inexact ALM framework and an inner proximal-point solver for Hölder-smooth subproblems, establishing rates where the dual progress slows while primal feasibility speeds up as ν decreases. They provide comprehensive complexity bounds, showing that ν<1 yields faster constraint satisfaction at the cost of slower objective decrease, and that linear constraint cases yield further improvements; ν=1 recovers the best-known ε^{-3}–ε^{-4} rates under standard assumptions. The paper also includes a robust analysis that does not require compact iterates and accommodates a generic convex term g, with numerical experiments in clustering and quadratic programs confirming the practical benefits of unconventional penalties. Overall, the results highlight a principled trade-off between primal and dual complexity and demonstrate the practical impact of using higher-order penalty terms in constrained nonconvex optimization.

Abstract

This work introduces an unconventional inexact augmented Lagrangian method where the augmenting term is a Euclidean norm raised to a power between one and two. The proposed algorithm is applicable to a broad class of constrained nonconvex minimization problems that involve nonlinear equality constraints. In a first part of this work, we conduct a full complexity analysis of the method under a mild regularity condition, leveraging an accelerated first-order algorithm for solving the Hölder-smooth subproblems. Interestingly, this worst-case result indicates that using lower powers for the augmenting term leads to faster constraint satisfaction, albeit with a slower decrease of the dual residual. Notably, our analysis does not assume boundedness of the iterates. Thereafter, we present an inexact proximal point method for solving the weakly-convex and Hölder-smooth subproblems, and demonstrate that the combined scheme attains an improved rate that reduces to the best-known convergence rate whenever the augmenting term is a classical squared Euclidean norm. Different augmenting terms, involving a lower power, further improve the primal complexity at the cost of the dual complexity. Finally, numerical experiments validate the practical performance of unconventional augmenting terms.

The inexact power augmented Lagrangian method for constrained nonconvex optimization

TL;DR

This work introduces an inexact power augmented Lagrangian method for nonconvex problems with nonlinear equality constraints by using a power-type augmenting term φ(A(x))=(1/(ν+1))||A(x)||^{ν+1} with ν∈(0,1]. The authors develop an outer-inexact ALM framework and an inner proximal-point solver for Hölder-smooth subproblems, establishing rates where the dual progress slows while primal feasibility speeds up as ν decreases. They provide comprehensive complexity bounds, showing that ν<1 yields faster constraint satisfaction at the cost of slower objective decrease, and that linear constraint cases yield further improvements; ν=1 recovers the best-known ε^{-3}–ε^{-4} rates under standard assumptions. The paper also includes a robust analysis that does not require compact iterates and accommodates a generic convex term g, with numerical experiments in clustering and quadratic programs confirming the practical benefits of unconventional penalties. Overall, the results highlight a principled trade-off between primal and dual complexity and demonstrate the practical impact of using higher-order penalty terms in constrained nonconvex optimization.

Abstract

This work introduces an unconventional inexact augmented Lagrangian method where the augmenting term is a Euclidean norm raised to a power between one and two. The proposed algorithm is applicable to a broad class of constrained nonconvex minimization problems that involve nonlinear equality constraints. In a first part of this work, we conduct a full complexity analysis of the method under a mild regularity condition, leveraging an accelerated first-order algorithm for solving the Hölder-smooth subproblems. Interestingly, this worst-case result indicates that using lower powers for the augmenting term leads to faster constraint satisfaction, albeit with a slower decrease of the dual residual. Notably, our analysis does not assume boundedness of the iterates. Thereafter, we present an inexact proximal point method for solving the weakly-convex and Hölder-smooth subproblems, and demonstrate that the combined scheme attains an improved rate that reduces to the best-known convergence rate whenever the augmenting term is a classical squared Euclidean norm. Different augmenting terms, involving a lower power, further improve the primal complexity at the cost of the dual complexity. Finally, numerical experiments validate the practical performance of unconventional augmenting terms.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 27 sections, 15 theorems, 127 equations, 4 figures, 4 tables, 4 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 1

The sequence $\{ y^k \}_{k \in \mathbb{N}}$ generated by alg:algorithm_nonconvex is bounded, i.e., there exists a $y_{\max} \in \mathbb{R}$, such that $\Vert y^{k} \Vert \leq y_{\max}$ for all $k \geq 1$.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Comparison of power ALM with various powers $\nu$ on solving the clustering problem with Fashion-MNIST data xiao_fashion-mnist_2017. The case $\nu = 1$ corresponds to iALM from sahin_inexact_2019.
  • Figure 2: Comparison of power ALM with various powers $\nu$ on solving the clustering problem with MNIST data deng_mnist_2012. The case $\nu = 1$ corresponds to iALM from sahin_inexact_2019.
  • Figure 3: Power ALM for various powers $\nu$ on solving $100$ random QPs of size $n = 100, m = 20$.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of the proposed power ALM with various powers $\nu$ on solving a representative GEVP with $n = 500$. The case $\nu = 1$ corresponds to the iALM from sahin_inexact_2019.

Theorems & Definitions (31)

  • Definition 1: $(\varepsilon_\varphi, \varepsilon_A)$-stationary points
  • Lemma 1
  • Lemma 2
  • Theorem 1: Outer complexity
  • Lemma 3: Augmented Lagrangian smoothness
  • Lemma 4: Inner complexity
  • Theorem 2: Total complexity
  • Lemma 5
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • ...and 21 more