Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Tight MIP Formulation for Pipeline Gas Flow with Linepack

T. Klatzer, S. Wogrin, D. A. Tejada-Arango, G. Morales-Espana

Abstract

In integrated power and gas energy system optimization models (ESOMs), pipeline gas transmission with linepack is a particularly complex problem due to its non-linear and non-convex character. For ESOMs based on mixed-integer linear programing, piecewise linearization is a well-established convexification approach for this problem, which, however, requires binary variables to model feasible combinations of linear gas flow and pressure segments and thus can quickly become computationally challenging. In order to improve computational performance, this paper proposes a piecewise linearization method specifically designed to be tight, resulting in a reduced problem space a solver can explore faster. We provide numerical results comparing the proposed formulation against two piecewise linearizations from the literature, both from a theoretical point of view and in terms of practical computational performance, with results showing an average speed-up of 2.83 times for our case study. Test cases are carried out on a modified 24-bus IEEE Reliability Test System and a 12-node gas system, considering discrete unit commitment decisions.

Tight MIP Formulation for Pipeline Gas Flow with Linepack

Abstract

In integrated power and gas energy system optimization models (ESOMs), pipeline gas transmission with linepack is a particularly complex problem due to its non-linear and non-convex character. For ESOMs based on mixed-integer linear programing, piecewise linearization is a well-established convexification approach for this problem, which, however, requires binary variables to model feasible combinations of linear gas flow and pressure segments and thus can quickly become computationally challenging. In order to improve computational performance, this paper proposes a piecewise linearization method specifically designed to be tight, resulting in a reduced problem space a solver can explore faster. We provide numerical results comparing the proposed formulation against two piecewise linearizations from the literature, both from a theoretical point of view and in terms of practical computational performance, with results showing an average speed-up of 2.83 times for our case study. Test cases are carried out on a modified 24-bus IEEE Reliability Test System and a 12-node gas system, considering discrete unit commitment decisions.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 20 sections, 38 equations, 3 figures, 8 tables.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Comparison of the linearized average gas flow under the Z and INC/SOS2 frameworks.
  • Figure 2: Integrated power and gas system.
  • Figure 3: Generation of gas-fired units under the INC (top), SOS2 (middle) and Z (bottom) framework for the winter day.