Three forms of the Erdős-Dushnik-Miller Theorem
Paul Howard, Eleftherios Tachtsis
TL;DR
The paper advances the understanding of the Erdős-Dushnik-Miller theorem in the absence of the axiom of choice by distinguishing three inequivalent EDM forms: $\mathsf{EDM_{DM}}$, $\mathsf{EDM_{BG}}$, and $\mathsf{EDM_{T}}$. It establishes a compact trichotomy of EDM forms in the ZF weak-choice hierarchy, and uses Fraenkel-Mostowski models to separate these forms from various weak choice principles, mapping where EDM variants sit relative to PC and AC. The results include proving EDM$_{DM}$ is equivalent to AC, EDM$_{BG}$ and EDM$_{T}$ relations in several FM models, and identifying models where EDM variants withstand or fail under symmetry constraints. The work provides a detailed landscape of how EDM interacts with PC inequalities, UT, and AC in multiple FM constructions, yielding both proven separations and several open questions. Overall, the findings deepen the classification of EDM strength without AC and illuminate the model-theoretic boundaries of weak choice principles.
Abstract
We continue the study of the Erdős-Dushnik-Miller theorem (A graph with an uncountable set of vertices has either an infinite independent set or an uncountable clique) in set theory without the axiom of choice. We show that there are three inequivalent versions of this theorem and we give some results about the positions of these versions in the deductive hierarchy of weak choice principles.
