Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Key subgroups in the Polish group of all automorphisms of the rational circle

Michael Megrelishvili

TL;DR

The paper investigates the Polish group $G = \operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q}_0)$ of circular order preserving permutations with the pointwise topology, showing that extremely amenable subgroups $H$ can be inj-key without being co-minimal in $G$. It constructs concrete counterexamples, notably $H = G_{a_0}$ (often isomorphic to $\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q},\le)$), to demonstrate inj-key while failing co-minimality, addressing questions from MeSh-key and linking to Pestov's inquiry about metrizable universal minimal flows $M(G)$. The work leverages a dense embedding of $G$ into $\mathrm{Homeo}_+ (\mathbb{T})$, analyzes the associated coset-topologies, and identifies the four-orbit structure of $M(G)$ (with orbits $\mathbb{Q}_0^-$, $\mathbb{Q}_0^+$, and $J$). It also discusses how these findings relate to Pestov's broader question and to the structure of the completion $\beta_G(\mathbb{Q}_0)$, suggesting that inj-key does not imply co-minimal even in geometrically natural Polish groups.

Abstract

Extending some results of a joint work with E. Glasner (2021) we continue to study the Polish group $G:=\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb{Q}_0)$ of all circular order preserving permutations of $\mathbb{Q}_0$ with the pointwise topology, where $\mathbb{Q}_0$ is the rational discrete circle. We show that certain extremely amenable subgroups $H$ of $G:=\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb{Q}_0)$ are inj-key (i.e., $H$ distinguishes weaker Hausdorff group topologies on $G$) but not co-minimal in $G$. This counterexample answers a question from a joint work with M. Shlossberg (2024) and is inspired by a question proposed by V. Pestov about Polish groups $G$ with metrizable universal minimal $G$-flow $M(G)$. It is an open problem to study Pestov's question in its full generality.

Key subgroups in the Polish group of all automorphisms of the rational circle

TL;DR

The paper investigates the Polish group of circular order preserving permutations with the pointwise topology, showing that extremely amenable subgroups can be inj-key without being co-minimal in . It constructs concrete counterexamples, notably (often isomorphic to ), to demonstrate inj-key while failing co-minimality, addressing questions from MeSh-key and linking to Pestov's inquiry about metrizable universal minimal flows . The work leverages a dense embedding of into , analyzes the associated coset-topologies, and identifies the four-orbit structure of (with orbits , , and ). It also discusses how these findings relate to Pestov's broader question and to the structure of the completion , suggesting that inj-key does not imply co-minimal even in geometrically natural Polish groups.

Abstract

Extending some results of a joint work with E. Glasner (2021) we continue to study the Polish group of all circular order preserving permutations of with the pointwise topology, where is the rational discrete circle. We show that certain extremely amenable subgroups of are inj-key (i.e., distinguishes weaker Hausdorff group topologies on ) but not co-minimal in . This counterexample answers a question from a joint work with M. Shlossberg (2024) and is inspired by a question proposed by V. Pestov about Polish groups with metrizable universal minimal -flow . It is an open problem to study Pestov's question in its full generality.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 15 theorems, 41 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.8

GM-UltraHom Let $X$ be a set containing at least three elements. For every c-order $R$ on $X$ the family of subsets forms a base for a Hausdorff topology $\tau_R$ which we call the interval topology of $R$. A topological space $(X,\tau)$ is said to be circularly ordered if there exists a circular order $R$ such that $\tau_R=\tau$.

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Example 2.4
  • Definition 2.6
  • Remark 2.7
  • Proposition 2.8
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.3
  • ...and 26 more